Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Radiographic Method to Evaluate Guided Bone Regeneration Outcomes Using a 3D-Printed Model

被引:0
|
作者
Shi J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lai H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Implant Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
[2] College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[3] National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai
[4] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai
关键词
A; artefact; cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); guided bone regeneration (GBR); implant; morphological contour interpolation (MCI); R; 318; 763.1;
D O I
10.1007/s12204-021-2294-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of a morphological contour interpolation (MCI) based segmentation method for the volumetric measurement of bone grafts around implants. Three 3D-printed models (one with a cylinder and two with a geometrically-complex form) were fabricated to simulate implant placement with a simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. All models were scanned using a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) instrument with the same parameters. The true volumes of the bone grafts in the models were assessed using computer-aided calculation (controls). For the test measurements, both manual and MCI-based methods were used. A comparison between the measured and true volumes was performed to evaluate the accuracy. The coefficients of variation of repeated measurements were calculated to evaluate the reproducibility. In addition, the execution time was recorded and a comparison between the two methods was performed. The high accuracy of the MCI-based method was found with differences between the measured value and actual volume, which never exceeded 7.3%. Excellent reproducibility was shown, with coefficients of variation never exceeding 1.1%. A shorter execution time was observed for the MCI-based method than for the manual method. Within the confines of this study, the MCI-based method may be suitable for volumetric measurements of grafted bone around implants. © 2021, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D-Printed Piezoelectric Scaffolds with Shape Memory Polymer for Bone Regeneration
    Li, Guanlin
    Li, Zehao
    Min, Yajun
    Chen, Shilu
    Han, Ruijia
    Zhao, Zheng
    SMALL, 2023, 19 (40)
  • [22] Techniques, mechanisms, and application of 3D-printed biodegradable metals for bone regeneration
    Wang, Lingxiao
    Liu, Yang
    Fan, Zhipeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2024, 10 (03) : 38 - 60
  • [23] 3D-printed hydroxyapatite microspheres reinforced PLGA scaffolds for bone regeneration
    Wei, Jiawei
    Yan, Yan
    Gao, Jing
    Li, Yubao
    Wang, Ruili
    Wang, Jiexin
    Zou, Qin
    Zuo, Yi
    Zhu, Meifang
    Li, Jidong
    BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES, 2022, 133
  • [24] 3D-Printed Composite Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone and Cartilage Integrated Regeneration
    Xu, Nanjian
    Lu, Dezhi
    Qiang, Lei
    Liu, Yihao
    Yin, Dalin
    Wang, Zhiyong
    Luo, Yongxiang
    Yang, Chen
    Ma, Zhenjiang
    Ma, Hui
    Wang, Jinwu
    ACS OMEGA, 2023, 8 (41): : 37918 - 37926
  • [25] 3D-Printed Silk Proteins for Bone Tissue Regeneration and Associated Immunomodulation
    Waidi, Yusuf Olatunji
    Debnath, Souvik
    Datta, Sudipto
    Chatterjee, Kaushik
    BIOMACROMOLECULES, 2024, 25 (09) : 5512 - 5540
  • [26] 3D-printed injectable nanocomposite cryogel scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration
    Castanheira, Edgar J.
    Maia, Joao R.
    Monteiro, Luis P. G.
    Sobreiro-Almeida, Rita
    Wittig, Nina K.
    Birkedal, Henrik
    Rodrigues, Joao M. M.
    Mano, Joao F.
    MATERIALS TODAY NANO, 2024, 28
  • [27] 3D-Printed Antibacterial Scaffolds for the Regeneration of Alveolar Bone in Severe Periodontitis
    Theodoridis, Konstantinos
    Arampatzis, Athanasios S.
    Liasi, Georgia
    Tsalikis, Lazaros
    Barmpalexis, Panagiotis
    Christofilos, Dimitrios
    Assimopoulou, Andreana N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (23)
  • [28] Multiscale porosity in mesoporous bioglass 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration
    Gomez-Cerezo, M. Natividad
    Pena, Juan
    Ivanovski, Saso
    Arcos, Daniel
    Vallet-Regi, Maria
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 120
  • [29] 3D-printed porous calcium silicate scaffolds with hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide hybrid coating for guided bone regeneration
    Liu, Kang
    Jin, Xin
    Wang, Min
    Bai, Yufei
    Jiang, Hongjiang
    Zhu, Qiang
    Zhang, Peng
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 51 (01) : 1103 - 1114
  • [30] Covalent Protein Immobilization on 3D-Printed Microfiber Meshes for Guided Cartilage Regeneration
    Ainsworth, Madison J.
    Lotz, Oliver
    Gilmour, Aaron
    Zhang, Anyu
    Chen, Michael J.
    McKenzie, David R.
    Bilek, Marcela M. M.
    Malda, Jos
    Akhavan, Behnam
    Castilho, Miguel
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2023, 33 (02)