Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Radiographic Method to Evaluate Guided Bone Regeneration Outcomes Using a 3D-Printed Model

被引:0
|
作者
Shi J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lai H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Implant Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
[2] College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[3] National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai
[4] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai
关键词
A; artefact; cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); guided bone regeneration (GBR); implant; morphological contour interpolation (MCI); R; 318; 763.1;
D O I
10.1007/s12204-021-2294-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of a morphological contour interpolation (MCI) based segmentation method for the volumetric measurement of bone grafts around implants. Three 3D-printed models (one with a cylinder and two with a geometrically-complex form) were fabricated to simulate implant placement with a simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. All models were scanned using a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) instrument with the same parameters. The true volumes of the bone grafts in the models were assessed using computer-aided calculation (controls). For the test measurements, both manual and MCI-based methods were used. A comparison between the measured and true volumes was performed to evaluate the accuracy. The coefficients of variation of repeated measurements were calculated to evaluate the reproducibility. In addition, the execution time was recorded and a comparison between the two methods was performed. The high accuracy of the MCI-based method was found with differences between the measured value and actual volume, which never exceeded 7.3%. Excellent reproducibility was shown, with coefficients of variation never exceeding 1.1%. A shorter execution time was observed for the MCI-based method than for the manual method. Within the confines of this study, the MCI-based method may be suitable for volumetric measurements of grafted bone around implants. © 2021, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Composite Lactide-Mineral 3D-Printed Scaffold for Bone Repair and Regeneration
    Fairag, Rayan
    Li, Li
    Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose Luis
    Taylor, M. Scott
    Gaerke, Brian
    Weber, Michael H.
    Rosenzweig, Derek H.
    Haglund, Lisbet
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [42] Nanostructured 3D-Printed Hybrid Scaffold Accelerates Bone Regeneration by Photointegrating Nanohydroxyapatite
    Tong, Lei
    Pu, Xiaocong
    Liu, Quanying
    Li, Xing
    Chen, Manyu
    Wang, Peilei
    Zou, Yaping
    Lu, Gonggong
    Liang, Jie
    Fan, Yujiang
    Zhang, Xingdong
    Sun, Yong
    ADVANCED SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (13)
  • [43] In situ magnesium phosphate/polycaprolactone 3D-printed scaffold induce bone regeneration in rabbit maxillofacial bone defect model
    Lei, Bocheng
    Gao, Xiaobo
    Zhang, Ran
    Yi, Xin
    Zhou, Qing
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 215
  • [44] Characterization of 3D-printed graphene-reinforced PLA scaffold for bone regeneration
    Karthic, Manoharan
    Chockalingam, Kunjan
    Vignesh, Chandran
    Nagarajan, K. Jawaharlal
    EMERGING MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (04) : 1 - 13
  • [45] 3D-printed gallium-infused scaffolds for osteolysis intervention and bone regeneration
    Xi, Hanrui
    Jiang, Xihao
    Xiong, Shilang
    Zhang, Yinuo
    Zhou, Jingyu
    Liu, Min
    Zhou, Zhigang
    Zhang, Chengyu
    Liu, Shiwei
    Long, Zhisheng
    Zhou, Jianguo
    Qian, Guowen
    Xiong, Long
    MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2025, 31
  • [46] Physical Characteristics and Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Polylactic-Co-Glycolic Acid Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Petposri, Sidabhat
    Thuaksuban, Nuttawut
    Buranadham, Supanee
    Suwanrat, Trin
    Punyodom, Winita
    Supphaprasitt, Woraporn
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [47] Customized 3D-Printed Mesh, Membrane, Bone Substitute, and Dental Implant Applied to Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology: A Narrative Review
    Di Spirito, Federica
    Giordano, Francesco
    Di Palo, Maria Pia
    Ferraro, Cosimo
    Cecere, Luigi
    Frucci, Eugenio
    Caggiano, Mario
    Lo Giudice, Roberto
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [48] 3D-printed oxygen-releasing scaffolds improve bone regeneration in mice
    Farris, Ashley L.
    Lambrechts, Dennis
    Zhou, Yuxiao
    Zhang, Nicholas Y.
    Sarkar, Naboneeta
    Moorer, Megan C.
    Rindone, Alexandra N.
    Nyberg, Ethan L.
    Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
    Burris, S. J.
    Free, Kendall
    Witham, Timothy F.
    Riddle, Ryan C.
    Grayson, Warren L.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2022, 280
  • [49] 3D-printed porous functional composite scaffolds with polydopamine decoration for bone regeneration
    Qi, Jin
    Wang, Yili
    Chen, Liping
    Chen, Linjie
    Wen, Feng
    Huang, Lijiang
    Rueben, Pfukwa
    Zhang, Chunwu
    Li, Huaqiong
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 10
  • [50] Comparative Efficacies of a 3D-Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Membrane and a Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Beagle Dogs
    Shim, Jin-Hyung
    Won, Joo-Yun
    Sung, Su-Jin
    Lim, Dong-Hyuk
    Yun, Won-Soo
    Jeon, Young-Chan
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    POLYMERS, 2015, 7 (10): : 2061 - 2077