Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results

被引:0
|
作者
F. Baum
U. Fischer
S. Obenauer
E. Grabbe
机构
[1] Department of Radiology,
[2] Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,undefined
[3] Robert-Koch-Strasse 40,undefined
[4] 37075 Göttingen,undefined
[5] Germany,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2002年 / 12卷
关键词
Computer-aided diagnosis Direct digital full-field mammography Microcalcifications BI-RADS classification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For the first time, full-field digital mammography (FFDM) allows computer-aided detection (CAD) analysis of directly acquired digital image data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CAD system in patients with histologically correlated breast cancer depicted with FFDM. Sixty-three cases of histologically proven breast cancer detected with FFDM (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Buc, France) were analyzed using a CAD system (Image Checker V2.3, R2 Technology, Los Altos, Calif.). Fourteen of these malignancies were characterized as microcalcifications, 37 as masses, and 12 as both. The mammographic findings were categorized as BI-RADS 3 (n=5), BI-RADS 4 (n=17) and BI-RADS 5 (n=40). The sensitivity for malignant lesions and the rate of false-positive marks per image were calculated. The sensitivity and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The sensitivity of the CAD R2 system in breast cancer seen on FFDM was 89% for microcalcifications [CI95%=(70%; 98%)] and 81% for masses [CI95%=(67%; 91%)]. As expected, the detection rate was higher in lesions categorized as BI-RADS 5 (37 of 40) compared with lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 (11 of 17). In the group categorized as BI-RADS 3 the detection rate was 4 of 5 lesions; however, this group was very small. The rate of false-positive marks was 0.35 microcalcification marks/image and 0.26 mass marks/image. The overall rate of false-positive marks was 0.61 per image. CAD based on FFDM provides an optimized work flow. Results are equivalent to the results reported for CAD analysis of secondarily digitized image data. Sensitivity for microcalcifications is acceptable and for masses is low. The number of false-positive marks per image should be reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:3015 / 3017
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Mendel, Kayla
    Li, Hui
    Sheth, Deepa
    Giger, Maryellen
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 735 - 743
  • [42] Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Im, Jung-Gi
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03) : 198 - 205
  • [43] Full-field digital mammography
    Bick, U
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 957 - 964
  • [44] Full-field digital mammography
    U Bick
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [45] Evaluation of Computer-aided Diagnosis on a Large Clinical Full-field Digital Mammographic Dataset
    Li, Hui
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Yuan, Yading
    Chen, Weijie
    Horsch, Karla
    Lan, Li
    Jamieson, Andrew R.
    Sennett, Charlene A.
    Jansen, Sanaz A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (11) : 1437 - 1445
  • [46] Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammogranris
    Wei, J
    Sahiner, B
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Chan, HP
    Petrick, N
    Helvie, MA
    Roubidoux, MA
    Ge, J
    Zhou, C
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (09) : 2827 - 2838
  • [47] Digital Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Hall, Ferris M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [48] Computer-aided detection in mammography
    Astley, SM
    Gilbert, FJ
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (05) : 390 - 399
  • [49] Mammography with computer-aided detection: Reproducibility assessment - Initial experience
    Zheng, B
    Hardesty, LA
    Poller, WR
    Sumkin, JH
    Golla, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) : 58 - 62
  • [50] Evaluation of a direct conversion full-field digital mammography detector
    Lee, DL
    Yorker, JG
    Jing, Z
    Hoffberg, MG
    Jeromin, LS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 463 - 464