Making choices in Russian: pros and cons of statistical methods for rival formsВыбор вариантных форм в русском языке: плюсы и минусы различных моделей статистического анализа

被引:0
|
作者
R. Harald Baayen
Anna Endresen
Laura A. Janda
Anastasia Makarova
Tore Nesset
机构
[1] University of Tübingen,
[2] University of Tromsø,undefined
关键词
Random Forest; Classification Tree; Variable Importance; Forest Model; Rival Form;
D O I
10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sometimes languages present speakers with choices among rival forms, such as the Russian forms ostrič’ vs. obstrič’ ‘cut hair’ and proniknuv vs. pronikši ‘having penetrated’. The choice of a given form is often influenced by various considerations involving the meaning and the environment (syntax, morphology, phonology). Understanding the behavior of rival forms is crucial to understanding the form-meaning relationship of language, yet this topic has not received as much attention as it deserves. Given the variety of factors that can influence the choice of rival forms, it is necessary to use statistical models in order to accurately discover which factors are significant and to what extent. The traditional model for this kind of data is logistical regression, but recently two new models, called ‘tree & forest’ and ‘naive discriminative learning’ have emerged as alternatives. We compare the performance of logistical regression against the two new models on the basis of four datasets reflecting rival forms in Russian. We find that the three models generally provide converging analyses, with complementary advantages. After identifying the significant factors for each dataset, we show that different sets of rival forms occupy different regions in a space defined by variance in meaning and environment.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 291
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The pros and cons of funnel plots as an aid to risk communication and patient decision making
    Rakow, Tim
    Wright, Rebecca J.
    Spiegelhalter, David J.
    Bull, Catherine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 106 (02) : 327 - 348
  • [42] Intangible Assets and Their Valuation Using Direct Intellectual Capital Methods: Pros and Cons
    Glova, Jozef
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-III, 2017, : 255 - 263
  • [43] Pros and cons of educational technologies as methods for disseminating evidence-based treatments
    Lane, JM
    Addis, ME
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2004, 11 (03) : 336 - 338
  • [44] Evaluating Pros and Cons of Antigen Screening by Molecular vs. Serologic Methods
    Delk, A.
    Gammon, R.
    TRANSFUSION, 2012, 52 : 153A - 154A
  • [45] Determination of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in breast carcinoma - Pros and cons and ranking of methods
    Bohm, W
    Dietrich, R
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1998, 58 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [46] NEW METHODS OF MAKING BUDGETARY CHOICES
    KUCEROVA, B
    POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 1974, 22 (04) : 381 - 381
  • [47] Microscopy Methods for Biofilm Imaging: Focus on SEM and VP-SEM Pros and Cons
    Relucenti, Michela
    Familiari, Giuseppe
    Donfrancesco, Orlando
    Taurino, Maurizio
    Li, Xiaobo
    Chen, Rui
    Artini, Marco
    Papa, Rosanna
    Selan, Laura
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2021, 10 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [49] An update on in vitro test methods in human hepatic drug biotransformation research: pros and cons
    Brandon, EFA
    Raap, CD
    Meijerman, I
    Beijnen, JH
    Schellens, JHM
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [50] Family solution or defamiliarization?: Pros and cons of the ways of making work and family compatible in the OECD countries
    Martinez Pastor, Juan Ignacio
    PRAXIS SOCIOLOGICA, 2010, (14): : 37 - 67