Making choices in Russian: pros and cons of statistical methods for rival formsВыбор вариантных форм в русском языке: плюсы и минусы различных моделей статистического анализа

被引:0
|
作者
R. Harald Baayen
Anna Endresen
Laura A. Janda
Anastasia Makarova
Tore Nesset
机构
[1] University of Tübingen,
[2] University of Tromsø,undefined
关键词
Random Forest; Classification Tree; Variable Importance; Forest Model; Rival Form;
D O I
10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sometimes languages present speakers with choices among rival forms, such as the Russian forms ostrič’ vs. obstrič’ ‘cut hair’ and proniknuv vs. pronikši ‘having penetrated’. The choice of a given form is often influenced by various considerations involving the meaning and the environment (syntax, morphology, phonology). Understanding the behavior of rival forms is crucial to understanding the form-meaning relationship of language, yet this topic has not received as much attention as it deserves. Given the variety of factors that can influence the choice of rival forms, it is necessary to use statistical models in order to accurately discover which factors are significant and to what extent. The traditional model for this kind of data is logistical regression, but recently two new models, called ‘tree & forest’ and ‘naive discriminative learning’ have emerged as alternatives. We compare the performance of logistical regression against the two new models on the basis of four datasets reflecting rival forms in Russian. We find that the three models generally provide converging analyses, with complementary advantages. After identifying the significant factors for each dataset, we show that different sets of rival forms occupy different regions in a space defined by variance in meaning and environment.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 291
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methods of determining safety integrity level (SIL) requirements - Pros and cons
    Gulland, WG
    PRACTICAL ELEMENTS OF SAFETY, 2004, : 105 - 122
  • [32] Pros and cons of different stunning methods from a Halal perspective: a review
    Riaz, Mian N.
    Irshad, Fariha
    Riaz, Nooran M.
    Regenstein, Joe M.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (04)
  • [33] Pros and cons of methylation-based enrichment methods for ancient DNA
    Seguin-Orlando, Andaine
    Gamba, Cristina
    Sarkissian, Clio Der
    Ermini, Luca
    Louvel, Guillaume
    Boulygina, Eugenia
    Sokolov, Alexey
    Nedoluzhko, Artem
    Lorenzen, Eline D.
    Lopez, Patricio
    McDonald, H. Gregory
    Scott, Eric
    Tikhonov, Alexei
    Stafford, Thomas W., Jr.
    Alfarhan, Ahmed H.
    Alquraishi, Saleh A.
    Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S.
    Shapiro, Beth
    Willerslev, Eske
    Prokhortchouk, Egor
    Orlando, Ludovic
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [34] Eigenmode expansion methods for simulation of optical propagation in photonics - Pros and cons
    Gallagher, DFG
    Felici, TP
    INTEGRATED OPTICS: DEVICES, MATERIALS, AND TECHNOLOGIES VII, 2003, 4987 : 69 - 82
  • [35] Current methods to study reactive oxygen species - Pros and cons Preface
    Winterbourn, Christine
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 2014, 1840 (02): : 707 - 707
  • [36] Soil protozoa as bioindicators: pros and cons, methods, diversity, representative examples
    Foissner, W
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) : 95 - 112
  • [37] Pros Amd Cons of Assessment Methods in the 2007 Turkish Earthquake Code
    Senboez, Ali
    Sucuoglu, Haluk
    TEKNIK DERGI, 2009, 20 (01): : 4609 - 4633
  • [38] A taxonomy of unsupervised feature selection methods including their pros, cons, and challenges
    Dwivedi, Rajesh
    Tiwari, Aruna
    Bharill, Neha
    Ratnaparkhe, Milind
    Tiwari, Alok Kumar
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2024, 80 (16): : 24212 - 24240
  • [39] Pros and cons of methylation-based enrichment methods for ancient DNA
    Andaine Seguin-Orlando
    Cristina Gamba
    Clio Der Sarkissian
    Luca Ermini
    Guillaume Louvel
    Eugenia Boulygina
    Alexey Sokolov
    Artem Nedoluzhko
    Eline D. Lorenzen
    Patricio Lopez
    H. Gregory McDonald
    Eric Scott
    Alexei Tikhonov
    Thomas W. Stafford,
    Ahmed H. Alfarhan
    Saleh A. Alquraishi
    Khaled A. S. Al-Rasheid
    Beth Shapiro
    Eske Willerslev
    Egor Prokhortchouk
    Ludovic Orlando
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [40] Radiolabelled proteins for positron emission tomography: Pros and cons of labelling methods
    Tolmachev, Vladimir
    Stone-Elander, Sharon
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 2010, 1800 (05): : 487 - 510