Evaluating Pros and Cons of Antigen Screening by Molecular vs. Serologic Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Delk, A. [1 ]
Gammon, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Floridas Blood Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:153A / 154A
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: Pros and cons
    MacDonald, JS
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1999, 26 (05) : 556 - 560
  • [2] PROS AND CONS OF METABOLOMICS VS. TARGETED TESTING
    Oglesbee, Devin
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2019, 127 (03) : 231 - 231
  • [3] Human ESC vs. iPSC—Pros and Cons
    Jane J. Pappas
    Phillip C. Yang
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2008, 1 : 96 - 99
  • [4] PROS AND CONS OF METABOLOMICS VS. TARGETED TESTING
    Oglesbee, Devin
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2019, 126 (03) : 272 - 272
  • [5] Antigen-based vs. systemic immunomodulation in type 1 diabetes The pros and cons
    Robert, Sofie
    Korf, Hannelie
    Gysemans, Conny
    Mathieu, Chantal
    [J]. ISLETS, 2013, 5 (02) : 53 - 66
  • [6] Human ESC vs. iPSC-Pros and Cons
    Pappas, Jane J.
    Yang, Phillip C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (02) : 96 - 99
  • [7] Effects of aspirin on the gastrointestinal tract: Pros vs. cons
    Li, Zhuoya
    Wang, Zheng
    Shen, Baile
    Chen, Chen
    Ding, Xiaoyun
    Song, Haojun
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 20 (03) : 2567 - 2578
  • [8] Lease vs. purchase: Closer look at pros and cons
    [J]. Timber Producer, 1999, (10):
  • [9] Probiotic lactic acid bacteria vs. bacilli: pros and cons
    Ouwehand, Arthur C.
    Forssten, Sofia
    Lehtinen, Markus
    Galbraith, Elizabeth
    Davis, Ellen
    [J]. AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2013, 24 (06): : 13 - 17
  • [10] Regional vs. national renal sharing organizations: Pros and cons
    Bertoni, E
    Carmellini, M
    Bandini, S
    Tosi, P
    Zanazzi, M
    Rosati, A
    Pradella, F
    Fossombroni, V
    Rindi, P
    Rizzo, G
    Mattiuz, P
    Mosca, F
    Salvadori, M
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 11 (03) : 214 - 216