Advantages of mesh tallying in MCNPX for 3D dose calculations in radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
I. Jabbari
M. Shahriari
S. M. R. Aghamiri
S. Monadi
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti University,Department of Medical Radiation Engineering
[2] Isfahan Milad Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
关键词
Monte Carlo; MCNPX; Mesh tally; 3D dose calculation; Treatment planning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The energy deposition mesh tally option of MCNPX Monte Carlo code is very useful for 3-Dimentional (3D) dose calculations. In this study, the 3D dose calculation was done for CT-based Monte Carlo treatment planning in which the energy deposition mesh tally were superimposed on merged voxel model. The results were compared with those of obtained from the common energy deposition (*F8) tally method for all cells of non-merged voxel model. The results of these two tallies and their respective computational times are compared, and the advantages of the proposed method are discussed. For this purpose, a graphical user interface (GUI) application was developed for reading CT slice data of patient, creating voxelized model of patient, optionally merging adjacent cells with the same material to reduce the total number of cells, reading beam configuration from commercial treatment planning system transferred in DICOM-RT format, and showing the isodose distribution on the CT images. To compare the results of Monte Carlo calculated and TiGRT planning system (LinaTech LLC, USA), treatment head of the Siemens ONCOR Impression accelerator was also simulated and the phase-space data on the scoring plane just above the Y-jaws was created and used. The results for a real prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan showed that the proposed method was fivefold faster while the precision was almost the same.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utilising radiotherapy dose to guide 3D surgical reconstructions for mandibular osteoradionecrosis
    West, Nick
    Willis, Nick
    Adams, James
    Kennedy, Matthew
    Jenkins, Glyndwr
    Iqbal, Shahid
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [22] Utilising radiotherapy dose to guide 3D surgical reconstructions for mandibular osteoradionecrosis
    West, N.
    Willis, N.
    Adams, J.
    Kennedy, M.
    Iqbal, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S427 - S428
  • [23] 3D dose verification of breathing adapted radiotherapy using gel dosimetry
    Maansson, S.
    Gustavsson, H.
    Karlsson, A.
    Wittgren, L.
    Back, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S151 - S151
  • [24] 3D in vivo dosimetry by means of entrance dosimetry for dose guided radiotherapy
    Hesse, B.
    Nill, S.
    Tuecking, T.
    Oelfke, U.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S46 - S46
  • [25] FACTORS AFFECTING PENUMBRAL SHAPE AND 3D DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN STEREOTAXIC RADIOTHERAPY
    THOMAS, SJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (04): : 761 - 771
  • [26] Predicting 3D dose distribution with scale attention network for prostate radiotherapy
    Adabi, Saba
    Tzeng, Tzu-Chi
    Yuan, Yading
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2022, 12034
  • [27] Real-Time Generation of Pareto 3D Dose Distributions for Radiotherapy
    Nguyen, D.
    Barkousaraie, A. Sadeghnejad
    Shen, C.
    Jia, X.
    Jiang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E368 - E368
  • [28] 3D Dose Based Patient Compensator QA Procedure for Proton Radiotherapy
    Zou, W.
    Reyhan, M.
    Zhang, M.
    Davis, R.
    Jabbour, S.
    Khan, A.
    Yue, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3331 - 3331
  • [29] 3D conformal radiotherapy for malignant astrocytomas: Dose escalation to 90 Gy
    Radany, EH
    Sandler, HM
    TenHaken, RK
    Marsh, LH
    Parker, P
    Greenberg, HS
    Junck, L
    Page, M
    Lichter, AS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 140 - 140
  • [30] Neural 3D Mesh Renderer
    Kato, Hiroharu
    Ushiku, Yoshitaka
    Harada, Tatsuya
    2018 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2018, : 3907 - 3916