Advanced land imager superiority in lithological classification utilizing machine learning algorithms

被引:22
|
作者
Ali Shebl
Timothy Kusky
Árpád Csámer
机构
[1] University of Debrecen,Department of Mineralogy and Geology
[2] Tanta University,Department of Geology
[3] China University of Geosciences,State Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences
[4] Badong National Observatory and Research Station for Geohazards,undefined
[5] China University of Geosciences,undefined
关键词
Lithologic mapping; ASTER; ALI; Sentinel 2; Eastern Desert;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-022-09948-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Different types of remote sensing data are commonly used as inputs for lithological classification schemes, yet determining the best data source for each specific application is still unresolved, but critical for the best interpretations. In addition, various classifiers (i.e., artificial neural network (ANN), maximum likelihood classification (MLC), and support vector machine (SVM)) have proven their variable efficiencies in lithological mapping, yet determining which technique is preeminent is still questionable. Consequently, this study aims to test the potency of Earth observing-1 Advanced Land Imager (ALI) data with the frequently utilized Sentinel 2 (S2), ASTER, and Landsat OLI (L8) data in lithological allocation using the widely accepted ANN, MLC, and SVM, for a case study in the Um Salatit area, in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. This area has a recent geological map that is used as a reference for selecting training and testing samples required for machine learning algorithms (MLAs). The results reveal (1) ALI superiority over the most commonly used S2, ASTER, and L8; (2) SVM is much better than MLC and ANN in executing lithologic allocation; (3) S2 is strongly recommended for separating higher numbers of classes compared to ASTER, L8, and ALI. Model overfitting may negatively impact S2 results in classifying small numbers of targets; (4) we can significantly enhance the classification accuracy, to transcend 90% by blending different sensor datasets. Our new approach can help significantly in further lithologic mapping in arid regions and thus be fruitful for mineral exploration programs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification Problems
    Sekeroglu, Boran
    Hasan, Shakar Sherwan
    Abdullah, Saman Mirza
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER VISION, VOL 2, 2020, 944 : 491 - 499
  • [32] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Somatotype Classification
    Katovic, Darko
    Cvjetko, Miljenko
    ICSPORTS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPORT SCIENCES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT, 2019, : 217 - 223
  • [33] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Data classification
    ul Hassan, Ch Anwar
    Khan, Muhammad Sufyan
    Shah, Munam Ali
    2018 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING (ICAC' 18), 2018, : 270 - 275
  • [34] Petrofacies classification using machine learning algorithms
    Silva A.A.
    Tavares M.W.
    Carrasquilla A.
    Misságia R.
    Ceia M.
    Silva, Adrielle A. (adrielle@lenep.uenf.br), 1600, Society of Exploration Geophysicists (85): : WA101 - WA113
  • [35] Use of machine learning-based classification algorithms in the monitoring of Land Use and Land Cover practices in a hilly terrain
    Deepanshu Parashar
    Ashwani Kumar
    Sarita Palni
    Arvind Pandey
    Anjaney Singh
    Ajit Pratap Singh
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [36] Use of machine learning-based classification algorithms in the monitoring of Land Use and Land Cover practices in a hilly terrain
    Parashar, Deepanshu
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Palni, Sarita
    Pandey, Arvind
    Singh, Anjaney
    Singh, Ajit Pratap
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (01)
  • [37] Machine Learning for Source Classification Utilizing Infrasound Data
    Fields, Morris P.
    Bennett, Hollis
    Scoggins, Randy
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS APPLICATIONS III, 2021, 11746
  • [38] UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS TO RESOLVE SPORTS CONTRACT DISPUTES
    Tian, Hongqiao
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA ACTIVIDAD FISICA Y DEL DEPORTE, 2024, 24 (97): : 106 - 120
  • [39] Impairment Screening Utilizing Biophysical Measurements and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Roshan, Saboora M.
    Park, Edward J.
    2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 5919 - 5923
  • [40] CLASSIFICATION OF SPAM MAIL UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES
    Alshawi, Bandar
    Munshi, Amr
    Alotaibi, Majid
    Alturki, Ryan
    Allheeib, Nasser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SECURITY, 2024, 16 (02): : 71 - 82