Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer

被引:14
|
作者
De Bernardo, Maddalena [1 ]
Borrelli, Maria [2 ]
Cembalo, Giovanni [1 ]
Rosa, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Ophthalmol, D-40204 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare PRO; standing position; sitting position; supine position; EPISCLERAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; RISK-FACTOR; FLUCTUATION; PNEUMATONOMETER; DIFFERENCE; BLOOD; HEAD;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55100701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: It has been established that body position can play an important role in intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation. IOP has been previously shown to increase significantly when lying down, relative to sitting; this type of investigation has not been extensively reported for the standing (ST) position. Therefore, this study aims to look for eventual significant IOP changes while ST, sitting, and lying down. Materials and Methods: An Icare PRO was used to measure the IOP of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals, with age ranging from 21 to 55 years (mean 29.22 +/- 9.12 years), in sitting, supine and ST positions; IOP was measured again, 5 min after standing (ST-5m). Results: Mean IOP difference between sitting and ST position was 0.39 +/- 1.93 mmHg (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.74 mmHg) (p = 0.027); between sitting and ST-5m, it was -0.48 +/- 1.79 mmHg (95% CI: -0.8 to -0.16 mmHg) (p = 0.004); between the sitting and supine position, it was -1.16 +/- 1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -1.5 to -0.82 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between the supine and ST position, it was 1.55 +/- 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.92 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between supine and ST-5m, it was 0.68 +/- 1.87 mmHg (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.02 mmHg) (p < 0.001); and between ST-5m and ST, it was 0.94 +/- 1.95 mmHg (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.29 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Mean axial eye length was 24.45 mm (95% CI: 24.22 to 24.69 mm), and mean central corneal thickness was 535.30 mu m (95% CI: 529.44 to 541.19 mu m). Conclusion: Increased IOP in the ST-5m position suggests that IOP measurements should be performed in this position too. The detection of higher IOP values in the ST-5m position than in the sitting one, may explain the presence of glaucoma damage or progression in apparently normal-tension or compensated patients.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure
    Dabasia, Priya L.
    Lawrenson, John G.
    Murdoch, Ian E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (08) : 1139 - 1143
  • [22] Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure
    Parodi, Maurizio Battaglia
    Iacono, Pierluigi
    Campa, Claudio
    La Spina, Carlo
    Triolo, Giacinto
    Lattanzio, Rosangela
    Bandello, Francesco
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 92 (03) : E243 - E244
  • [23] Evaluation of intraocular pressure estimates obtained using an iCare rebound tonometer
    Khanal, Safal
    Walton, Meredith
    Davey, Pinakin Gunvant
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2017, 100 (02) : 179 - 183
  • [24] Relationship of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure by iCare Rebound Tonometer
    Rao, Aparna
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Prakash, B.
    Varshney, Gopal
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (06) : 380 - 384
  • [25] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients
    Salim, Sarwat
    Du, Haiming
    Wan, Jim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [26] Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in chickens using a rebound tonometer: Quantitative evaluation of variance due to position inaccuracies
    Prashar, A.
    Guggenheim, J. A.
    Erichsen, J. T.
    Hocking, Pm.
    Morgan, J. E.
    EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2007, 85 (04) : 563 - 571
  • [27] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects
    Guler, Mete
    Bilak, Semsettin
    Bilgin, Burak
    Simsek, Ali
    Capkin, Musa
    Reyhan, Ali Hakim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [28] A portable applanation tonometer for accurate intraocular pressure measurements
    Feng, Tingting
    Chen, Xinjian
    Geng, Jialei
    Nie, Baoqing
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2022, 344
  • [29] Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Darhad, Urtogtah
    Tatsumi, Yasuko
    Fujioka, Miyuki
    Kusuhara, Azusa
    Maeda, Hidetaka
    Negi, Akira
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (02) : 332 - 334
  • [30] Reproducibility of intraocular pressure self-measurement by ICare Home rebound tonometer and comparison with Goldman applanation tonometer
    Gaillard, R.
    Fenolland, J. R.
    Bonnel, S.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Marill, A. F.
    Bostanci, K.
    Giraud, J. M.
    Renard, J. P.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2015, 93