Association Between Early Confirmatory Testing and the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Men With Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Kaye, Deborah R.
Qi, Ji
Morgan, Todd M.
Linsell, Susan
Lane, Brian R.
Montie, James E.
Cher, Michael L.
Miller, David C.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Dow Div Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Spectrum Hlth Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
CYCLE PROGRESSION SCORE; BIOPSY; CANDIDATES; COHORT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between the use and results of early confirmatory testing and persistence on active surveillance (AS). METHODS We identified all men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer from June 2016 to June 2017. We next examined trends in the use of early confirmatory test(s), defined as repeat biopsy, prostate magnetic resonance imaging, or molecular classifiers obtained within 6 months of the initial cancer diagnosis, in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. We then compared the proportion of men remaining on AS 6 months after diagnosis according to reassuring vs nonreassuring results, also stratifying by age and Gleason score. RESULTS Among 2529 patients, 32.7% underwent early confirmatory testing within 6 months of diagnosis. Its use increased from 25.4% in the second quarter of 2016 to 34.9% in the second quarter of 2017 (P = .025). Molecular classifiers were most frequently used (55%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (34%) and repeat biopsy (11%). Sixty-four percent (n = 523) had a reassuring result. Rates of AS were higher for patients with early reassuring results; 82% remained on AS (n = 427) compared to 52% (n = 157) of those with nonreassuring results and 51% (n = 873) with no early confirmatory testing (P <.001). CONCLUSION Rates of AS are higher among men with early reassuring results, supporting the clinical utility of these tests. Nonetheless, high rates of AS among patients with nonreassuring results underscore the complexity of shared decision-making in this setting. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Association between Early Confirmatory Testing and the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer Editorial Comment
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (06): : 1164 - 1165
  • [2] THE IMPACT OF CONFIRMATORY TESTING ON THE ADOPTION OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR MEN WITH FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Kaye, Deborah
    Qi, Ji
    Morgan, Todd
    Linsell, Susan
    Lane, Brian
    Montie, James
    Miller, David
    Cher, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E205 - E205
  • [3] Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    George, Arvin K.
    Rosenberg, Bradley H.
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03): : 600 - 608
  • [4] Thoughts on Criteria for Active Surveillance of Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 961 - 962
  • [5] Active Surveillance for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Short Review
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 665 - 670
  • [6] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER IN AFRICAN CARIBBEAN MEN: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Meunier, Matthias
    Eyraud, Remi
    Senechal, Cedric
    Gourtaud, Gilles
    Roux, Virginie
    Lanchon, Cecilia
    Brureau, Laurent
    Blanchet, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E561 - E562
  • [7] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2007, 4 (12): : 692 - 698
  • [8] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 : 692 - 698
  • [9] Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03): : 607 - 608
  • [10] Incidence of Reclassification in Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Kim, J.
    Davis, J. W.
    Ward, J.
    Wang, X.
    Pettaway, C.
    Pisters, L.
    Matin, S.
    Kuban, D.
    Frank, S. J.
    Lee, A. K.
    Prokhorova, I. N.
    Brown, V. T.
    Logothetis, C. J.
    Troncoso, P.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 204A - 204A