Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Radhakrishnan, Archana [1 ]
Wallner, Lauren P. [1 ,2 ]
Skolarus, Ted A. [3 ,4 ]
George, Arvin K. [3 ]
Rosenberg, Bradley H. [5 ]
Abrahamse, Paul [6 ]
Hawley, Sarah T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, Dept Urol, Rochester, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2022年 / 208卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
watchful waiting; prostate-specific antigen; urologists; biopsy; primary health care; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TRIFECTA;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000002734
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer do not receive all the recommended testing. Reasons for variation in receipt are unknown.Materials and Methods: We combined prospective registry data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, a collaborative of 46 academic and community urology practices across Michigan, with insurance claims from 2014 to 2018 for men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer. We defined receipt of recommended surveillance according to the collaborative's low-intensity criteria as: annual prostate specific antigen testing and either magnetic resonance imaging or prostate biopsy every 3 years. We assessed receipt of recommended surveillance among men with >= 36 months of followup (246). We conducted multilevel analyses to examine the influence of the urologist, urologist and primary care provider visits, and patient demographic and clinical factors on variation in receipt.Results: During 3 years of active surveillance, just over half of men (56.5%) received all recommended surveillance testing (69.9% annual prostate specific antigen testing, 72.8% magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy). We found 19% of the variation in receipt was attributed to individual urologists. While increasing provider visits were not significantly associated with receipt, older men were less likely to receive magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy (>= 75 vs <55 years, adjusted odds ratio 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.81).Conclusions: Nearly half of men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer did not receive all recommended surveillance. While urologists substantially influenced receipt of recommended testing, exploring how to leverage patients and their visits with their primary care providers to positively influence receipt appears warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 608
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03): : 607 - 608
  • [2] Thoughts on Criteria for Active Surveillance of Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 961 - 962
  • [3] THE IMPACT OF CONFIRMATORY TESTING ON THE ADOPTION OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR MEN WITH FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Kaye, Deborah
    Qi, Ji
    Morgan, Todd
    Linsell, Susan
    Lane, Brian
    Montie, James
    Miller, David
    Cher, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E205 - E205
  • [4] Active Surveillance for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Short Review
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 665 - 670
  • [5] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER IN AFRICAN CARIBBEAN MEN: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Meunier, Matthias
    Eyraud, Remi
    Senechal, Cedric
    Gourtaud, Gilles
    Roux, Virginie
    Lanchon, Cecilia
    Brureau, Laurent
    Blanchet, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E561 - E562
  • [6] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2007, 4 (12): : 692 - 698
  • [7] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 : 692 - 698
  • [8] Association Between Early Confirmatory Testing and the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Men With Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer
    Kaye, Deborah R.
    Qi, Ji
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Linsell, Susan
    Lane, Brian R.
    Montie, James E.
    Cher, Michael L.
    Miller, David C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 118 : 127 - 133
  • [9] Diet and lifestyle interventions in active surveillance patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer
    Kenfield S.A.
    Chang S.T.
    Chan J.M.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2007, 8 (3) : 173 - 196
  • [10] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: What are the results and how safe is it?
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2007, 8 (5) : 341 - 344