Active Surveillance for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Short Review

被引:11
|
作者
Lawrentschuk, Nathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Klotz, Laurence [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Urol, 2075 Bayview Ave,Suite MG-408, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Austin Hosp, Ludwig Inst Canc Res, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hosp, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Needle biopsy; Outcome assessment; Prostate neoplasms; Prostate-specific antigen; Review;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Active surveillance is becoming a more widely accepted management strategy in men with low-risk localized prostate cancer. This is in recognition of the knowledge that most men with such cancer are likely to die from other causes. The obvious benefits of active surveillance are reduced morbidity by delaying or avoiding radical gland therapy. These advantages should be balanced against appropriate selection criteria and triggers for moving to radical therapy while on active surveillance. The optimal method by which to identify the small number of men who will progress by use of clinical, biopsy, and imaging data is yet to be defined. Nevertheless, active surveillance is an appealing management option in selected men with prostate cancer and represents a solution to the significant problem of the overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant disease that accompanies prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 670
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thoughts on Criteria for Active Surveillance of Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 961 - 962
  • [2] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2007, 4 (12): : 692 - 698
  • [3] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 : 692 - 698
  • [4] Incidence of Reclassification in Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Kim, J.
    Davis, J. W.
    Ward, J.
    Wang, X.
    Pettaway, C.
    Pisters, L.
    Matin, S.
    Kuban, D.
    Frank, S. J.
    Lee, A. K.
    Prokhorova, I. N.
    Brown, V. T.
    Logothetis, C. J.
    Troncoso, P.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 204A - 204A
  • [5] Diet and lifestyle interventions in active surveillance patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer
    Kenfield S.A.
    Chang S.T.
    Chan J.M.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2007, 8 (3) : 173 - 196
  • [6] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: AN UPDATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PROGRAM
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Eldefrawy, Ahmed
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    Iremashvili, Viacheslav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E273 - E274
  • [7] Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Langkilde, Niels Christian
    Borre, Michael
    Jakobsen, Erik B.
    Frey, Anders
    Lund, Lars
    Lunden, Dagmar
    Dah, Claus
    Brasso, Klaus
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (04) : E814 - E821
  • [8] Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: What are the results and how safe is it?
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2007, 8 (5) : 341 - 344
  • [9] Active surveillance versus radical treatment for favorable-risk localized prostate cancer
    Klotz L.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2006, 7 (5) : 355 - 362
  • [10] Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    George, Arvin K.
    Rosenberg, Bradley H.
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03): : 600 - 608