Association Between Early Confirmatory Testing and the Adoption of Active Surveillance for Men With Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Kaye, Deborah R.
Qi, Ji
Morgan, Todd M.
Linsell, Susan
Lane, Brian R.
Montie, James E.
Cher, Michael L.
Miller, David C.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Dow Div Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Spectrum Hlth Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
CYCLE PROGRESSION SCORE; BIOPSY; CANDIDATES; COHORT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between the use and results of early confirmatory testing and persistence on active surveillance (AS). METHODS We identified all men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer from June 2016 to June 2017. We next examined trends in the use of early confirmatory test(s), defined as repeat biopsy, prostate magnetic resonance imaging, or molecular classifiers obtained within 6 months of the initial cancer diagnosis, in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. We then compared the proportion of men remaining on AS 6 months after diagnosis according to reassuring vs nonreassuring results, also stratifying by age and Gleason score. RESULTS Among 2529 patients, 32.7% underwent early confirmatory testing within 6 months of diagnosis. Its use increased from 25.4% in the second quarter of 2016 to 34.9% in the second quarter of 2017 (P = .025). Molecular classifiers were most frequently used (55%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (34%) and repeat biopsy (11%). Sixty-four percent (n = 523) had a reassuring result. Rates of AS were higher for patients with early reassuring results; 82% remained on AS (n = 427) compared to 52% (n = 157) of those with nonreassuring results and 51% (n = 873) with no early confirmatory testing (P <.001). CONCLUSION Rates of AS are higher among men with early reassuring results, supporting the clinical utility of these tests. Nonetheless, high rates of AS among patients with nonreassuring results underscore the complexity of shared decision-making in this setting. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Active Surveillance for Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer PRO
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2565 - 2566
  • [32] Oncological Outcomes in Men With Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Enrolled in Active Surveillance
    Pepe, Pietro
    Pepe, Ludovica
    Pennisi, Michele
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (03): : 1300 - 1305
  • [33] Risk of missing advanced stage or high grade tumors during active surveillance (AS) even in favorable-risk prostate cancer (PC)
    Kim, Jeri
    Ward, John Francis
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Wang, Xuemei
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Lee, Andrew
    Pisters, Louis L.
    Matin, Surena F.
    Shah, Jay Bakul
    Karam, Jose A.
    Chapin, Brian Francis
    Papadopoulos, John N.
    Achim, Mary F.
    Hoffman, Karen Elizabeth
    Pugh, Thomas J.
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Logothetis, Christopher
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Davis, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [34] Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Landis, Patricia
    Wolf, Sacha
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (30) : 3379 - +
  • [35] Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer Implications for Active Surveillance in Men With Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Raldow, Ann C.
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Moran, Brian J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [36] THE USE AND OUTCOMES OF MEN WITH NCCN FAVORABLE INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER MANAGED WITH ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Paudel, Roshan
    Madan, Raghav
    Qi, Ji
    Cher, Michael
    Lane, Brian
    George, Arvin
    Semerjian, Alice
    Ginsburg, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E745 - E745
  • [37] Active Surveillance for Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer in African Caribbean Men: Results of a Prospective Study
    Meunier, Matthias
    Eyraud, Remi
    Senechal, Cedric
    Gourtaud, Gilles
    Roux, Virginie
    Lanchon, Cecilia
    Brureau, Laurent
    Blanchet, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (05): : 1229 - 1235
  • [38] Active Surveillance for Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer BEWARE THE RISKS
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2566 - 2568
  • [39] Contemporary approach to active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [40] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN UTILITY LEVELS AND ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE AMONG MEN WITH LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
    Chhatre, Sumedha
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Talwar, Ruchika
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Wein, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E696 - E696