Simulation Comparison of Birdcage Coil and Metamaterial Liner for MRI at 3T and 4.7T

被引:0
|
作者
Maunder, Adam [1 ,2 ]
De Zanche, Nicola [1 ]
Iyer, Ashwin K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
metamaterial; magnetic resonance imaging; RF coil; travelling wave MRI; EM-simulations; birdcage coil; 7; T; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The application of a thin metamaterial (MTM) liner to the RF shield of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system is proposed to improve whole-body imaging compared to conventional "birdcage" body volume coils. The MTM liner facilitates travelling wave (TW) MRI, where the radio-frequency (RF) magnetic field propagates within the MRI bore, which acts as circular waveguide. Full-wave electromagnetic simulations were performed comparing a conventional birdcage coil to a novel MTM liner design in terms of key MR RF performance metrics: transmit efficiency, homogeneity and specific absorption rate (SAR). The designs are compared at 3T (128 MHz) and 4.7T (200MHz), two high-field strengths where the RF field homogeneity and SAR constraints are critical. The ring-structure design of the MTM liner is described and simulations with an empty MRI bore and a homogeneous human body model are performed, including realistic losses for the lumped components used in practical construction. The results show that the MTM liner has a similar mean transmit efficiency, while having reduced 10g averaged local SAR compared to the conventional birdcage.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1070
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-resolution MRI of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3T: Comparison of surface coil and volume coil
    Bittersohl, Bernd
    Huang, Thomas
    Schneider, Erika
    Biazar, Philip
    Winalski, Carl
    Lang, Philipp
    Yoshioka, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (03) : 701 - 707
  • [22] Investigation of the B1 field distribution and RF power deposition in a birdcage coil as functions of the number of coil legs at 4.7 T, 7.0 T, and 11.7 T
    Seo, Jeung-Hoon
    Han, Sang-Doc
    Kim, Kyoung-Nam
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 66 (12) : 1822 - 1826
  • [23] Investigation of the B1 field distribution and RF power deposition in a birdcage coil as functions of the number of coil legs at 4.7 T, 7.0 T, and 11.7 T
    Jeung-Hoon Seo
    Sang-Doc Han
    Kyoung-Nam Kim
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 66 : 1822 - 1826
  • [24] Influence of reference tube location on the measured sodium concentrations in calf muscles using a birdcage coil at 3T
    Baron, Paul
    Potze, Jan Hendrik
    Sijens, Paul E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 90 (02) : 624 - 632
  • [25] A 64-channel 3T array coil for accelerated brain MRI
    Keil, Boris
    Blau, James N.
    Biber, Stephan
    Hoecht, Philipp
    Tountcheva, Veneta
    Setsompop, Kawin
    Triantafyllou, Christina
    Wald, Lawrence L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (01) : 248 - 258
  • [26] SNR Variability with Frontal Coil Plate Displacement in 3T Head MRI
    Mathieu, William
    Popovic, Milica
    Farivar, Reza
    2024 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE BIOMEDICAL CONFERENCE, IMBIOC 2024, 2024, : 131 - 133
  • [27] Eight-channel transmit/receive body MRI coil at 3T
    Vernickel, P.
    Roeschmann, P.
    Findeklee, C.
    Luedeke, K.-M.
    Leussler, Ch.
    Overwag, J.
    Katscher, U.
    Graesslin, I.
    Schuenemann, K.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 58 (02) : 381 - 389
  • [28] An eight-channel sodium/proton coil for brain MRI at 3T
    Lakshmanan, Karthik
    Brown, Ryan
    Madelin, Guillaume
    Qian, Yongxian
    Boada, Fernando
    Wiggins, Graham C.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 31 (02)
  • [29] A deep brain stimulation-conditioned RF coil for 3T MRI
    Kutscha, Nicolas
    Mahmutovic, Mirsad
    Bhusal, Bhumi
    Vu, Jasmine
    Chemlali, Chaimaa
    Hansen, Sam-Luca J. D.
    May, Markus W.
    Knake, Susanne
    Golestanirad, Laleh
    Keil, Boris
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2025, 93 (03) : 1411 - 1426
  • [30] A comparison of 3T MR imaging of the prostate with and without an endorectal coil
    Ischia, J.
    Co, S.
    Harris, A.
    Kozlowski, P.
    Jones, E.
    Chang, S.
    Goldenberg, L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 119 - 120