Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5-to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial

被引:11
|
作者
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [1 ]
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan [1 ]
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Dent Implantol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
immediate loaded protocol; implant retained-mandibular overdenture; ISQ; long-term clinical study; marginal bone level change; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction; success rate; survival rate; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; RETENTION; STABILITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13098
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 +/- 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator (R) attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 +/- 1.19 mm, 0.68 +/- 0.90 mm, and 1.55 +/- 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 487
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture therapy: A clinical study of patients' response
    Pan, Yu-Hwa
    Yu, Ling-Ming
    Lin, Tai-Min
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 9 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [2] Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: A clinical trial of two anchorage systems
    Menicucci, G
    Lorenzetti, M
    Pera, P
    Preti, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (06) : 851 - 856
  • [3] Computerised occlusal analysis of mini-dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 1-year prospective clinical study
    Kabbua, Phongkamon
    Aunmeungtong, Weerapan
    Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 47 (06) : 757 - 765
  • [4] Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aunmeungtong, Weerapan
    Kumchai, Thongnard
    Strietzel, Frank P.
    Reichart, Peter A.
    Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) : 328 - 340
  • [5] Care and Aftercare Related to Implant-Retained Dental Crowns in the Maxillary Aesthetic Region: A 5-Year Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
    Visser, Anita
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Meijndert, Leo
    Vissink, Arjan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (02) : 157 - 167
  • [6] One-Piece Mini Dental Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: 10-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Non-Comparative Longitudinal Observational Study
    Schenk, Nicole
    Bukvic, Hristina
    Schimmel, Martin
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Enkling, Norbert
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 15 (04)
  • [7] Wear Assessment of Novel PEEK Telescopic Attachment for Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Clinical Trial Study
    Quassem, Mohamed A.
    Badr, Wesam E.
    Mansour, Mamdouh M.
    Mahross, Hamada Z.
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 18
  • [8] Preliminary study of clinical outcomes for single implant-retained mandibular overdentures
    Asami, Mari
    Kanazawa, Manabu
    Lam, Thuy, V
    Thu, Khaing M.
    Sato, Daisuke
    Minakuchi, Shunsuke
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 62 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [9] Five- to six-year results of a prospective clinical trial using the ENDOPORE® dental implant and a mandibular overdenture
    Deporter, D
    Watson, P
    Pharoah, M
    Levy, D
    Todescan, R
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (02) : 95 - 102
  • [10] Evolution of in vivo assessed retention forces in one-piece mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 5-Year follow-up of a prospective clinical trial
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Enkling, Norbert
    Srinivasan, Murali
    Haueter, Marius
    Worni, Andreas
    Schimmel, Martin
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05) : 968 - 976