Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5-to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial

被引:11
|
作者
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [1 ]
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan [1 ]
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Dent Implantol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
immediate loaded protocol; implant retained-mandibular overdenture; ISQ; long-term clinical study; marginal bone level change; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction; success rate; survival rate; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; RETENTION; STABILITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13098
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 +/- 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator (R) attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 +/- 1.19 mm, 0.68 +/- 0.90 mm, and 1.55 +/- 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 487
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Willingness to accept or refuse mandibular implant overdenture treatment: A prospective study on edentulous enrolled in a clinical trial
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    Nascimento, Lays Noleto
    Silva, Jesio Rodrigues
    de Paula, Marcella Silva
    Curado, Thalita Fernandes Fleury
    McKenna, Gerald
    Schimmel, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 50 (05) : 392 - 399
  • [32] General health, healthcare costs and dental care use of elderly with a natural dentition, implant-retained overdenture or conventional denture: an 8-year cohort of Dutch elderly (aged 75 and over)
    Mieke H. Bakker
    Arjan Vissink
    Gerry M. Raghoebar
    Lilian L. Peters
    Anita Visser
    BMC Geriatrics, 21
  • [33] General health, healthcare costs and dental care use of elderly with a natural dentition, implant-retained overdenture or conventional denture: an 8-year cohort of Dutch elderly (aged 75 and over)
    Bakker, Mieke H.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Peters, Lilian L.
    Visser, Anita
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [34] PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES - A COMPARISON WITH NEW COMPLETE DENTURES NOT RETAINED BY IMPLANTS - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    BOERRIGTER, EM
    GEERTMAN, ME
    VANOORT, RP
    BOUMA, J
    RAGHOEBAR, GM
    VANWAAS, MAJ
    VANTHOF, MA
    BOERING, G
    KALK, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 33 (05): : 282 - 288
  • [35] Patient satisfaction and crestal bone changes with one-piece and two-piece single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A randomized controlled clinical study
    Singh, Swati
    Mishra, Sunil Kumar
    Chowdhary, Ramesh
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [36] Comparative Evaluation of Survival Rates and Marginal Bone Levels of Nonsplinted Immediately Loaded Interforaminal Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with 5-Year Results
    Ates, Gokcen
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Sulun, Tonguc
    Dayan, Suleyman Cagatay
    Geckili, Onur
    Tuncer, Necat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (05) : 954 - 962
  • [37] Clinical outcomes of implant- versus abutment-level connection in screw-retained fixed dental prostheses: A 5-year randomized controlled trial
    Toia, Marco
    Parpaiola, Andrea
    Stevanello, Nicole
    Tattan, Mustafa
    Saleh, Muhammad H. A.
    Ravida, Andrea
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 230 - 241
  • [38] Comparative Study between an Immediate Loading Protocol Using the Digital Workflow and a Conventional Protocol for Dental Implant Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Rattanapanich, Piyanut
    Aunmeungtong, Weerapan
    Chaijareenont, Pisaisit
    Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [39] Retention forces in mini-dental-implant retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year outcomes of a non-comparative longitudinal observational study
    Hristina Bukvic
    Nicole Schenk
    Sebastian Hinz
    Martin Schimmel
    Norbert Enkling
    Samir Abou-Ayash
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 11 (1)
  • [40] Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Adaskevicius, Rimas
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (05): : 271 - 279