Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5-to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial

被引:11
|
作者
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [1 ]
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan [1 ]
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Dent Implantol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
immediate loaded protocol; implant retained-mandibular overdenture; ISQ; long-term clinical study; marginal bone level change; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction; success rate; survival rate; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; RETENTION; STABILITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13098
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 +/- 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator (R) attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 +/- 1.19 mm, 0.68 +/- 0.90 mm, and 1.55 +/- 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 487
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lithium disilicate and PEEK implant-retained single crowns - a randomized, prospective clinical study
    Joksimovic, Ena
    Scepanovic, Miodrag
    Staletovic, Danijela
    Pejic-Duspara, Mirjana
    Bijelic, Borivoj
    Djordjevic, Vladan
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2022, 150 (1-2) : 23 - 28
  • [22] Six-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures - a pilot study
    Passia, Nicole
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Kern, Matthias
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (10) : 1191 - 1194
  • [23] Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures-Results of preliminary prospective study
    Harder, Soenke
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Egert, Christopher
    Kern, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 (10) : 656 - 661
  • [24] A comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial
    Harris, David
    Hoefer, Stefan
    O'Boyle, Ciaran A.
    Sheridan, Sean
    Marley, John
    Benington, Ian C.
    Clifford, Tom
    Houston, Frank
    O'Connell, Brian
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [25] Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
    Celebic, Asja
    Kovacic, Ines
    Petricevic, Nikola
    Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser
    Topic, Jolanda
    Junakovic, Luka
    Persic-Kirsic, Sanja
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (01):
  • [26] Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
    Zhou, Huan
    Jiao, Yang
    Ma, Chu-Fan
    Wang, Chao
    Zhao, San-Jun
    Tian, Min
    Tay, Franklin R.
    Chen, Ji-Hua
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (21)
  • [27] Randomized prospective clinical trial of two implant systems for overdenture treatment: a comparison of the 2-year and 5-year results using the clinical implant performance scale
    Kwakman, JM
    Voorsmit, RACA
    Freihofer, HPM
    Van Waas, MAJ
    Geertman, ME
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) : 94 - 98
  • [28] Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants
    Zygogiannis, Kostas
    Aartman, Irene H. A.
    Parsa, Azin
    Tahmaseb, Ali
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (06) : 1377 - 1388
  • [29] Digital and Analog Analysis of Occlusion in Conventional and Implant-Retained Complete Dentures: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial
    Floriani, Franciele
    Sabatini, Gabriela Panca
    dos Santos, Tarla Thaynara Oliveira
    Philippi, Analucia Gebler
    Gonzaga, Luiz Henrique
    Mezzomo, Luis Andre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [30] An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures
    Timmerman, R
    Stoker, GT
    Wismeijer, D
    Oosterveld, P
    Vermeeren, JIJF
    van Waas, MAJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (08) : 630 - 633