Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry

被引:81
|
作者
Kornafel, Kathleen L.
Ho, Minh N.
Henderson, Simon R.
Sgarlata, Carmelo S.
Koopersmith, Tina
Cowart, Catherine L.
Riggall, Frank C.
Pabon, Julio E.
Jabamoni, Reena
Levrant, Seth
Ying, Yu-Kang
Nash, Lillian D.
Husami, Nabil
Bennett, Henry G.
Beauchamp, Pedro J.
Brumley, Harold W.
Youngkin, Jeffrey
机构
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; gamete intrafallopian transfer; zygote intrafallopian transfer; cryopreserved embryos; donor oocytes;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.056
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that were initiated in the United States in 2001. Design: Data were collected electronically using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System software and submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/SART Registry. Participant(s): Three hundred eighty-five clinics submitted data on procedures performed in 2001. Data were collated after November 2001 so that the outcomes of all pregnancies would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Incidence of clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, and delivery. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 108,130 cycles of ART treatment. Of these, 79,042 cycles involved IVF (with and without micromanipulation), with a delivery rate per retrieval of 31.6%; 340 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer, with a delivery rate per retrieval of 21.9%; 661 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer, with a delivery rate per retrieval of 31.0%. The following additional ART procedures were also initiated: 8,147 fresh donor oocyte cycles, with a delivery rate per transfer of 47.3%; 14,509 frozen ET procedures, with a delivery rate per transfer of 23.5%; 3,187 frozen ETs employing donated oocytes or embryos, with a delivery rate per transfer of 27.4%; and 1,366 cycles using a host uterus, with a delivery rate per transfer of 38.7%. In addition, 112 cycles were reported as combinations of more than one treatment type, 8 cycles as research, and 85 as embryo banking. As a result of all procedures, 29,585 deliveries were reported, resulting in 41,168 neonates. Conclusion(S): In 2001, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant increase in reported cycles compared with 2000.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1266
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred
    Dickey, Richard P.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (06) : 1554 - 1561
  • [22] Assessment of Turkey IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines
    Calik, Kiymet Yesilcicek
    Bulut, Hacer Kobya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (03) : 421 - 426
  • [23] Assisted reproductive technology: Impact on society and need for surveillance
    De Geyter, Christian
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2019, 33 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [24] Society's contribution to assisted reproductive technology abuse
    Kol, S
    Itskovitz-Eldor, J
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (08) : 2362 - 2362
  • [26] Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine - possibilities and limitations
    Szamatowicz, Marian
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 87 (12) : 820 - 823
  • [27] Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013
    Dyer, Silke
    Archary, Paversan
    de Mouzon, Jacques
    Fiadjoe, Moise
    Ashiru, Oladapo
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (02) : 216 - 224
  • [28] Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Jungheim, Emily S.
    Ryan, Ginny L.
    Levens, Eric D.
    Cunningham, Alexandra F.
    Macones, George A.
    Carson, Kenneth R.
    Beltsos, Angeline N.
    Odem, Randall R.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1432 - 1436
  • [29] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Jewett, Amy
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Kroelinger, Charlan D.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2022, 71 (04): : 1 - 19
  • [30] Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States
    Nangia, Ajay K.
    Likosky, Donald S.
    Wang, Dongmei
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (03) : 745 - +