Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry

被引:81
|
作者
Kornafel, Kathleen L.
Ho, Minh N.
Henderson, Simon R.
Sgarlata, Carmelo S.
Koopersmith, Tina
Cowart, Catherine L.
Riggall, Frank C.
Pabon, Julio E.
Jabamoni, Reena
Levrant, Seth
Ying, Yu-Kang
Nash, Lillian D.
Husami, Nabil
Bennett, Henry G.
Beauchamp, Pedro J.
Brumley, Harold W.
Youngkin, Jeffrey
机构
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; gamete intrafallopian transfer; zygote intrafallopian transfer; cryopreserved embryos; donor oocytes;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.056
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that were initiated in the United States in 2001. Design: Data were collected electronically using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System software and submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/SART Registry. Participant(s): Three hundred eighty-five clinics submitted data on procedures performed in 2001. Data were collated after November 2001 so that the outcomes of all pregnancies would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Incidence of clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, and delivery. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 108,130 cycles of ART treatment. Of these, 79,042 cycles involved IVF (with and without micromanipulation), with a delivery rate per retrieval of 31.6%; 340 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer, with a delivery rate per retrieval of 21.9%; 661 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer, with a delivery rate per retrieval of 31.0%. The following additional ART procedures were also initiated: 8,147 fresh donor oocyte cycles, with a delivery rate per transfer of 47.3%; 14,509 frozen ET procedures, with a delivery rate per transfer of 23.5%; 3,187 frozen ETs employing donated oocytes or embryos, with a delivery rate per transfer of 27.4%; and 1,366 cycles using a host uterus, with a delivery rate per transfer of 38.7%. In addition, 112 cycles were reported as combinations of more than one treatment type, 8 cycles as research, and 85 as embryo banking. As a result of all procedures, 29,585 deliveries were reported, resulting in 41,168 neonates. Conclusion(S): In 2001, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant increase in reported cycles compared with 2000.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1266
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2017
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Jewett, Amy
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Kroelinger, Charlan D.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2020, 69 (09): : 1 - 20
  • [32] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2011
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2014, 63 (10): : 1 - 28
  • [33] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2011
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2014, 63 (10): : 1 - 30
  • [34] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitty M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Callaghan, William M.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2019, 68 (04): : 1 - 23
  • [35] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2010
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara
    Anderson, John E.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2013, 62 (09): : 1 - 24
  • [36] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2018, 67 (03): : 1 - 22
  • [37] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Warner, Lee
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2017, 66 (06): : 1 - 24
  • [38] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2013
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Warner, Lee
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2015, 64 (11): : 1 - 25
  • [39] Surveillance of assisted reproductive technology in the United States - An update
    Meikle, SF
    Danel, I
    Wilcox, LS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [40] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2012
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Warner, Lee
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2015, 64 (06): : 1 - 29