Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States

被引:25
|
作者
Nangia, Ajay K. [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Dongmei [3 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Urol Sect, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Dept Surg, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice & Comm, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
关键词
ART; SART; population; service areas; mandated coverage; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; REGIONAL-VARIATIONS; INSURANCE MANDATES; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; CARE; INFERTILITY; DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the disparity of assisted reproductive technology (ART) Centers in the United States as they relate to residential locations of populations in their reproductive years and state-mandated coverage for infertility services. Design: Cross-sectional Study. Setting: Population in reproductive years (women 20-44 years; men 20-49 years) based oil US Census 2000 data. Assisted reproductive technology centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in 2005. Main Outcome Measure(s): Populations within service area served by in-state and neighboring state ART centers as defined by a 60-minute travel time along road networks from each center. Result(s): Service areas for 387 of 390 ART centers were calculated. Fourteen states had some form of mandated coverage. Underserved States included Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and West Virginia. The northeastern United States had the greatest percentage of overserved population With 66%-100% study population within 60 minutes of all ART center. Female age stratification showed the highest age group (35-44 years) per state in northern New England and the youngest in Utah and District Of Columbia. Median total study population within 60 minutes of an ART center in their own state was higher in mandated Versus nonmandated states. Conclusion(s): Disparity of access to care for infertility services exists from the standpoint of population service areas for ART centers and state-mandated covet-age. Female age stratification may help anticipate future need for services with existing resource distribution. (Fertil Steril (R) 22010;93:745-61. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:745 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States
    Rebar, RW
    DeCherney, AH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (16): : 1603 - 1604
  • [2] Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update
    Toner, James P.
    Coddington, Charles C.
    Doody, Kevin
    Van Voorhis, Brad
    Seifer, David B.
    Ball, G. David
    Luke, Barbara
    Wantman, Ethan
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : 541 - 546
  • [3] Impact of satellite clinics on geographic access to assisted reproductive technology services in the United States
    Micajah Z. McGarity
    Christopher N. Herndon
    John A. Harris
    Benjamin F. Hobbs
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [4] Impact of satellite clinics on geographic access to assisted reproductive technology services in the United States
    McGarity, Micajah Z.
    Herndon, Christopher N.
    Harris, John A.
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Jewett, Amy
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Kroelinger, Charlan D.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2022, 71 (04): : 1 - 19
  • [6] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2011
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2014, 63 (10): : 1 - 30
  • [7] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitty M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Callaghan, William M.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2019, 68 (04): : 1 - 23
  • [8] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2017
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Jewett, Amy
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Warner, Lee
    Kroelinger, Charlan D.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2020, 69 (09): : 1 - 20
  • [9] Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2011
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2014, 63 (10): : 1 - 28
  • [10] Surveillance of assisted reproductive technology in the United States - An update
    Meikle, SF
    Danel, I
    Wilcox, LS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (01) : 11 - 14