Effects of scatter in dual-source CT

被引:1
|
作者
Kyriakou, Y. [1 ]
Ertel, D. [1 ]
Krause, J. [1 ]
Kalender, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Med Phys, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2760409
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the magnitude and distribution of scatter for dual‐source CT (DSCT) and its impact on image quality. Materials and Methods: Apart from forward scatter which is given for all CT scanners, the measurements at a dual‐source system is also affected by cross scattered photons from the second tube‐detector system arranged at 90°. Simulations and measurements of homogenous phantoms of increasing diameter (100–400 mm) and of anthropomorphic phantoms were conducted for a DSCT scanner (SOMATOM Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). The simulations of both forward and cross scatter were carried out using combined analytical and Monte Carlo simulation methods using a collimation of 19.2 mm for both tube‐detector systems. Measurements of cross scatter were performed by switching one tube off, still reading out the corresponding detector. Cross scatter was evaluated with respect to anthropomorphic and homogeneous phantoms for different imaging conditions such as different tube voltages, bow—tie filters. Dual‐energy scanning was included in the evaluations. Results: The forward scatter fraction increased with increasing diameter to 10% for a PMMA phantom of 400 mm diameter; for cross scatter, the mean intensity was lower or equivalent to forward scatter for small phantoms but was larger for increased phantom diameters. For large objects the ratio of cross scatter intensity to the sum of primary signal and forward scatter intensity reaches values higher than 100%. The outer dimensions of the object appear to be decisive for cross‐scatter whereas the influence of phantom inhomogeneity appears to be negligible. For dual energy — dual source scan modes the tube current setting for each tube should be adapted to achieve a minimization of cross scatter. Conclusion: The cross scatter magnitude is non‐negligible for a DSCT system and a compensation of its contribution is necessary for the assurance of high image quality. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2345 / 2345
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Left Atrial Myxoma by Dual-Source CT
    Thorsten R. C. Johnson
    Dirk-André Clevert
    Stephanie Busch
    Michael Schweyer
    Konstantin Nikolaou
    Maximilian F. Reiser
    Christoph R. Becker
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2007, 30 : 1085 - 1086
  • [22] Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience
    Johnson, Thorsten R. C.
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Wintersperger, Bernd J.
    Leber, Alexander W.
    von Ziegler, Franz
    Rist, Carsten
    Buhmann, Sonja
    Knez, Andreas
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Becker, Christoph R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (07) : 1409 - 1415
  • [23] Dual-Energy and Dual-Source CT: Is There a Role in the Abdomen and Pelvis?
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Hartman, Robert
    Guimaraes, Luis
    Huprich, James E.
    Hough, David M.
    Yu, Lifeng
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 47 (01) : 41 - +
  • [24] A Novel Technique for Estimating and Correcting Cross-Scatter in Dual-Source CBCT
    Giles, W.
    Bowsher, J.
    Li, H.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3891 - 3891
  • [25] Xenon ventilation CT with a dual-energy technique of dual-source CT: Initial experience
    Chae, Eun Jin
    Seo, Joon Beom
    Goo, Hyun Woo
    Kim, Namkug
    Song, Koun-Sik
    Lee, Sang Do
    Hong, Soo-Jong
    Krauss, Bernhard
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (02) : 615 - 624
  • [26] First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system
    Thomas G. Flohr
    Cynthia H. McCollough
    Herbert Bruder
    Martin Petersilka
    Klaus Gruber
    Christoph Süß
    Michael Grasruck
    Karl Stierstorfer
    Bernhard Krauss
    Rainer Raupach
    Andrew N. Primak
    Axel Küttner
    Stefan Achenbach
    Christoph Becker
    Andreas Kopp
    Bernd M. Ohnesorge
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 1405 - 1405
  • [27] Radiation Dose at Coronary CT Angiography: Second-Generation Dual-Source CT Versus Single-Source 64-MDCT and First-Generation Dual-Source CT
    Fink, Christian
    Krissak, Radko
    Henzler, Thomas
    Lechel, Ursula
    Brix, Gunnar
    Takx, Richard A. P.
    Nance, John W.
    Abro, Joseph A.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (05) : W550 - W557
  • [28] Advantages of Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT for Radiation Therapy Planning
    Noid, G.
    Tai, A.
    Schott, D.
    Prah, D.
    Mistry, N.
    Robbins, J.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E129 - E130
  • [29] Abdominal dual-source dual-energy CT: Uses in clinical practice
    Siegel, Marilyn J.
    Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos
    Graser, Anno
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (11) : 10 - 16
  • [30] Low dose dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta
    Farrelly, Cormac
    Davarpanah, Amir
    Keeling, Aoife N.
    Sheehan, John
    Ragin, Ann
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Carr, James C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2011, 27 (07): : 1025 - 1034