Effect of panel-reactive antibody in predicting crossmatch selection of cadaveric kidney recipients

被引:28
|
作者
Lieber, S. R.
Perez, F. V. T.
Tabossi, M. R.
Persoli, L. B. L.
Marques, S. B. D.
Mazzali, M.
Alves-Filho, G.
de Souza, C. A.
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Hematol & Hemotherapy Ctr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Clin Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.045
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aim. The influence of panel-reactive antibody level (%PRA) on crossmatch results was evaluated among 866 patients on the waiting list for cadaveric renal allografting from January 2001 to August 2005. We evaluated the results for 124 potential donors for a kidney, including 2008 crossmatches. Four hundred eighteen patients were tested against only 1 donor. Methods. Serum samples were screened for anti-HLA antibodies using immunoglobulin (Ig)G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) PRA kit and the %PRA of the most reactive sample (peak) was used for patient stratification, according to sensitization level. Crossmatches were performed on fresh donor T lymphocytes from peripheral lymph nodes, using classical and anti-human-globulin enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-T) methods. The tests were performed using peak and current patient sera before and after dithiothreitol treatment. The crossmatch was assumed to be negative when no reactivity was observed in all tests. Results. The incidences of positive crossmatch were as follows: 72.3%,14.6%, and 7.2%, among patients with PRA > 50%, PRA :<= 50%, and PRA = 0%, respectively. A negative crossmatch was observed in 6.5% (4 of 62) of the tests among 100% PRA patients. Conclusion. Although %PRA level reflects the HLA sensitization of the patient, IgG ELISA PRA and CDC-T crossmatch may not reflect the same antibodies, and both results must be considered in a transplantation decision.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 431
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current trend of induction and maintenance treatment in positive panel-reactive antibody patients: a report on OPTN/UNOS kidney transplant registry data
    Cai, Junchao
    Terasaki, Paul I.
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (05) : 649 - 654
  • [42] Use of Panel-Reactive Antibody Testing in the Planning and Management of Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    Jeffrey, Joseph H.
    Denny, Matthew R.
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Sarnicola, Enrica
    Wright, Elizabeth
    Govil, Amit
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (08) : 963 - 966
  • [43] POSITIVE PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY AND NEGATIVE DONOR-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES WERE ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION IN PATIENTS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Ha Nguyen Thi Thu
    Dung Nguyen Thi Thuy
    Kien Truong Quy
    Ha Do Manh
    Duc Nguyen Van
    Van Diem Thi
    Dai Do Khac
    Quyet Do
    Toan Pham Quoc
    Manh Bui Van
    Thang Le Viet
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 104 (09) : S374 - S374
  • [44] CHANGE IN PANEL REACTIVE ANTIBODY AND KIDNEY TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES
    Wai, Lim
    Jeremy, Chapman
    Germaine, Wong
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2015, 93 (09): : A34 - A34
  • [45] INFLUENCE ON SUCCESS OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION OF PRE-EXISTING ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES WITH DIFFERENT VALUES OF CALCULATED PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY (CPRA)
    Gracheva, Liudmila
    Charlamova, Leolla
    Petrova, Larisa
    Rumiantcev, Aleksandr
    Khalikova, Diana
    Valov, Aleksei
    Bologov, Andrei
    Molchanova, Elena
    Stolyarevich, Ekaterina
    TISSUE ANTIGENS, 2015, 85 (05): : 410 - 410
  • [46] INFLUENCE OF PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY AND LYMPHOCYTOTOXIC CROSS-MATCH ON SURVIVAL AFTER HEART-TRANSPLANTATION
    LAVEE, J
    KORMOS, RL
    DUQUESNOY, RJ
    ZERBE, TR
    ARMITAGE, JM
    VANEK, M
    HARDESTY, RL
    GRIFFITH, BP
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 10 (06): : 921 - 930
  • [47] Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation
    Wu, Wenrui
    Zhang, Huanxi
    Tan, Jinghong
    Fu, Qian
    Li, Jun
    Wu, Chenglin
    Huang, Huiting
    Xu, Bowen
    Ling, Liuting
    Liu, Longshan
    Su, Xiaojun
    Wang, Changxi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [48] Impact of Pretransplant Panel-Reactive Antibody Level on Ocular Surface Stem Cell Survival and Visual Outcome
    Govil, A.
    Cheung, A.
    Sarnicola, E.
    Genereux, B.
    Holland, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 610 - 610
  • [49] Outcomes in the highest panel reactive antibody recipients of deceased donor kidneys under the new kidney allocation system
    Parajuli, Sandesh
    Redfield, Robert R.
    Astor, Brad C.
    Djamali, Arjang
    Kaufman, Dixon B.
    Mandelbrot, Didier A.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (03)
  • [50] The Effect of Panel Reactive Antibody Results on Graft Functions of Patients with Chronic Kidney Failure
    Pirim, Ibrahim
    Ayna, Tulay Kilicaslan
    Gulec, Derya
    Soyoz, Mustafa
    Kocyigit, Asli Ozkizilcik
    Gungor, Toprak Hamdi
    Yuksel, Ceren
    Gurbuz, Burcu Cerci
    Totur, Ismail
    Akman, Burcu
    Tatar, Erhan
    Tugmen, Cem
    Sert, Ismail
    Soypacaci, Zeki
    Uslu, Adam
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 3 (03): : 105 - 110