Effect of panel-reactive antibody in predicting crossmatch selection of cadaveric kidney recipients

被引:28
|
作者
Lieber, S. R.
Perez, F. V. T.
Tabossi, M. R.
Persoli, L. B. L.
Marques, S. B. D.
Mazzali, M.
Alves-Filho, G.
de Souza, C. A.
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Hematol & Hemotherapy Ctr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Clin Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.045
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aim. The influence of panel-reactive antibody level (%PRA) on crossmatch results was evaluated among 866 patients on the waiting list for cadaveric renal allografting from January 2001 to August 2005. We evaluated the results for 124 potential donors for a kidney, including 2008 crossmatches. Four hundred eighteen patients were tested against only 1 donor. Methods. Serum samples were screened for anti-HLA antibodies using immunoglobulin (Ig)G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) PRA kit and the %PRA of the most reactive sample (peak) was used for patient stratification, according to sensitization level. Crossmatches were performed on fresh donor T lymphocytes from peripheral lymph nodes, using classical and anti-human-globulin enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-T) methods. The tests were performed using peak and current patient sera before and after dithiothreitol treatment. The crossmatch was assumed to be negative when no reactivity was observed in all tests. Results. The incidences of positive crossmatch were as follows: 72.3%,14.6%, and 7.2%, among patients with PRA > 50%, PRA :<= 50%, and PRA = 0%, respectively. A negative crossmatch was observed in 6.5% (4 of 62) of the tests among 100% PRA patients. Conclusion. Although %PRA level reflects the HLA sensitization of the patient, IgG ELISA PRA and CDC-T crossmatch may not reflect the same antibodies, and both results must be considered in a transplantation decision.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 431
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DETECTION OF KIDNEY REACTIVE ANTIBODIES AT CROSSMATCH IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    EVANS, PR
    TRICKETT, LP
    GOSNEY, AR
    HODGES, E
    SHIRES, S
    WILSON, PJ
    MACIVER, AG
    GARDNER, B
    SLAPAK, M
    SMITH, JL
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 46 (06) : 844 - 852
  • [32] Generation of Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Values Using a Reference Panel of Bone Marrow Donors.
    Kransdorf, E.
    Gragert, L.
    Pando, M.
    Kaur, N.
    Patel, J.
    Kim, I.
    Zhang, X.
    Maiers, M.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 670 - 670
  • [33] HLA PHENOTYPES AND PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODIES (PRA) OF THE CROATIAN ESRD PATIENTS ON THE WAITING LIST FOR CADAVERIC TRANSPLANTATION
    Batarelo, Mirica
    Palfi, Biserka
    Martinez, Natalija
    Salamunovic, Sanja
    Grubic, Zorana
    Zunec, Renata
    TISSUE ANTIGENS, 2015, 85 (05): : 429 - 429
  • [34] Screening panel-reactive antibody negative, single-antigen positive: a case report
    Jawdat, Dunia
    Al Qurashi, Salem
    Al Sayyari, Abdulla
    Hajeer, Ali H.
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 24 (04) : 341 - 343
  • [35] HLA phenotypes of ESRD patients are risk factors in the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) response
    Heise, E
    Manning, C
    Thacker, L
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 15 : 22 - 27
  • [36] VIRTUAL CROSSMATCH AND CALCULATED PANEL REACTIVE ANTIBODY: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN
    Lima, Bruno
    Alves, Helena
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 813 - 813
  • [37] A Comparison of Platelet Crossmatch Versus Panel Reactive Antibody in Detection of Platelet Refractoriness
    Al Mana, Abdulaziz
    Alghamdi, Sarah
    Duque, Miriam Andrea
    Olivares, Esperanza
    Andrews, David
    TRANSFUSION, 2020, 60 : 221A - 222A
  • [38] Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype is a predictive factor in the peak panel-reactive antibody response
    Akçay, A
    Özdemir, FN
    Ataç, FB
    Sezer, S
    Verdi, H
    Arat, Z
    Haberal, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (01) : 35 - 37
  • [39] Sex differences in preformed panel-reactive antibody levels and outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation
    Magnussen, Christina
    Ruebsamen, Nicole
    Ojeda, Francisco M.
    Rybczynski, Meike
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Bernhardt, Alexander M.
    Schnabel, Renate B.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 33 (06)
  • [40] Current trend of induction and maintenance treatment in positive panel-reactive antibody patients:a report on OPTN/UNOS kidney transplant registry data
    Junchao Cai
    Paul I.Terasaki
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2011, (05) : 649 - 654