Effect of panel-reactive antibody in predicting crossmatch selection of cadaveric kidney recipients

被引:28
|
作者
Lieber, S. R.
Perez, F. V. T.
Tabossi, M. R.
Persoli, L. B. L.
Marques, S. B. D.
Mazzali, M.
Alves-Filho, G.
de Souza, C. A.
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Hematol & Hemotherapy Ctr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Clin Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.01.045
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aim. The influence of panel-reactive antibody level (%PRA) on crossmatch results was evaluated among 866 patients on the waiting list for cadaveric renal allografting from January 2001 to August 2005. We evaluated the results for 124 potential donors for a kidney, including 2008 crossmatches. Four hundred eighteen patients were tested against only 1 donor. Methods. Serum samples were screened for anti-HLA antibodies using immunoglobulin (Ig)G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) PRA kit and the %PRA of the most reactive sample (peak) was used for patient stratification, according to sensitization level. Crossmatches were performed on fresh donor T lymphocytes from peripheral lymph nodes, using classical and anti-human-globulin enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-T) methods. The tests were performed using peak and current patient sera before and after dithiothreitol treatment. The crossmatch was assumed to be negative when no reactivity was observed in all tests. Results. The incidences of positive crossmatch were as follows: 72.3%,14.6%, and 7.2%, among patients with PRA > 50%, PRA :<= 50%, and PRA = 0%, respectively. A negative crossmatch was observed in 6.5% (4 of 62) of the tests among 100% PRA patients. Conclusion. Although %PRA level reflects the HLA sensitization of the patient, IgG ELISA PRA and CDC-T crossmatch may not reflect the same antibodies, and both results must be considered in a transplantation decision.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 431
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transplantation of High Panel-Reactive Antibody Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Without Crossmatch Using On-Bypass Pheresis and Alemtuzumab
    Lick, Scott D.
    Beckles, Daniel L.
    Piovesana, Giovanni
    Vaidya, Smita
    Indrikovs, Alexander
    Barbagelata, N. Alexander
    Valentine, Vincent
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (04): : 1428 - 1434
  • [22] ROLE OF PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY CROSS-REACTIVITY IN PREDICTING SURVIVAL AFTER ORTHOTOPIC HEART-TRANSPLANTATION
    LOH, E
    BERGIN, JD
    COUPER, GS
    MUDGE, GH
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 13 (02): : 194 - 201
  • [23] Panel Reactive Antibody Responses Against Influenza Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Khishigsuren, B.
    Demir, E.
    Akgul, S. U.
    Temurhan, S.
    Ucar, A. R.
    Dirim, A. B.
    Catikkas, N. M.
    Bayraktar, A.
    Caliskan, Y.
    Yazici, H.
    Oguz, F. S.
    Turkmen, A.
    Sever, M. S.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 51 (04) : 1115 - 1117
  • [24] Influence of panel-reactive antibodies on posttransplant outcomes in lung transplant recipients - Discussion
    Ungerleider, RM
    Lau
    Baumgartner, WA
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (05): : 1524 - 1524
  • [25] Effect of Panel-Reactive Antibody on Graft Survival in Living Kidney Donor Transplantation: Analysis of 10 Years in a Transplant Center in Veracruz, Mexico
    Martinez-Mier, Gustavo
    Vicente Vazquez-Crespo, Luis
    Angeles-Hernandez, Fausto
    Cesar Vinas-Dozal, Julio
    Moreno-Ley, Pedro, I
    Budar-Fernandez, Luis F.
    Mendez-Lopez, Marco T.
    Allende-Castellanos, Carlos A.
    Jimenez-Lopez, Luis A.
    Bonilla-Casas, Elias
    De La Paz-Roman, Maritza
    Eduardo Fuentes-Zamudio, Einar
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (04) : 1140 - 1142
  • [26] A high panel-reactive antibody rescue protocol for cross-match-positive live donor kidney transplants
    Schweitzer, EJ
    Wilson, JS
    Fernandez-Vina, M
    Fox, M
    Gutierrez, M
    Wiland, A
    Hunter, J
    Farney, A
    Philosophe, B
    Colonna, J
    Jarrell, BE
    Bartlett, ST
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (10) : 1531 - 1536
  • [27] Do African-Americans wait longer for a kidney because of HLA class I antibody specificities and panel-reactive antibody sensitization?
    Luger, AM
    Bryan, CF
    OBrien, BJ
    Pierce, GE
    Shield, CF
    Warady, BA
    Aeder, MI
    Landreneau, MD
    Nelson, PW
    Ross, G
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (01) : 157 - 159
  • [28] Peak Panel Reactive Antibody, Cancer, Graft, and Patient Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Lim, Wai H.
    Chapman, Jeremy R.
    Wong, Germaine
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (05) : 1043 - 1050
  • [29] Utility of panel reactive antibody level in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients
    Moaddab, M.
    Eagar, T.
    Saharia, A.
    Mobley, C. M.
    Hobeika, M. J.
    Moore, L.
    Graviss, A.
    Nguyen, D. T.
    Gaber, A. O.
    Ghobrial, R. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (8S) : 104 - 104
  • [30] Calculated panel-reactive antibody predicts outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list
    Kransdorf, Evan P.
    Kittleson, Michelle M.
    Patel, Jignesh K.
    Pando, Marcelo J.
    Steidley, D. Eric
    Kobashigawa, Jon A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (07): : 787 - 796