Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography

被引:14
|
作者
Massera, Rodrigo Trevisan [1 ]
Tomal, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Fis Gleb Wataghin, BR-13083859 Campinas, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Monte Carlo; Mammography; Dosimetry; Skin model; X-RAY-SPECTRA; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; BREAST DOSIMETRY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONVERSION FACTORS; DGN COEFFICIENTS; PHANTOM; VALUES; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify the influence of different skin models on mammographic breast dosimetry, based on dosimetric protocols and recent breast skin thickness findings. Methods: By using an adapted PENELOPE (v. 2014)+ PenEasy (v. 2015) Monte Carlo (MC) code, simulations were performed in order to obtain the mean glandular dose (MGD), the normalized MGD by incident air Kerma (DgN), and the glandular depth dose (GDD(z)). The geometry was based on a cranio-caudal mammographic examination. Monoenergetic and polyenergetic beams were implemented, for a breast thickness from 2 cm to 9 cm, with different compositions. Seven skin models were used: a 5mm adipose layer; a skin layer ranging from 5mm to 1.45 mm, a 1.45mm skin thickness with a subcutaneous adipose layer of 2mm and 3.55 mm. Results: The differences, for monoenergetic beams, are higher (up to 200%) for lower energies (8 keV), thicker and low glandular content breasts, decreasing to less than 5% at 40 keV. Without a skin layer, the differences reach a maximum of 1240%. The relative difference in DgN values for 1.45mm skin and 5mm adipose layers and polyenergetic beams varies from -14% to 12%. Conclusions: The implemented MC code is suitable for mammography dosimetry calculations. The skin models have major impacts on MGD values, and the results complement previous literature findings. The current protocols should be updated to include a more realistic skin model, which provides a reliable breast dose estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSESSMENT OF MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    FAULKNER, K
    LAW, J
    ROBSON, KJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (812): : 877 - 881
  • [2] The Impact of Mammography Physics Instrumentation On Entrance Air Kerma and Mean Glandular Dose
    Brateman, L.
    Heintz, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [3] Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose and Entrance Surface Dose in Mammography
    Abdallah, Yousif M.
    Abuhadi, Nouf H.
    Aldousari, Hanan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (02): : 8 - 11
  • [4] Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: Effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography
    Ng, KH
    Aus, RJ
    DeWerd, LA
    Vetter, JR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) : 395 - 398
  • [5] AN INVESTIGATION INTO VARIATIONS IN THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    FAULKNER, K
    CRANLEY, K
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1995, 57 (1-4) : 405 - 407
  • [6] Investigation of Mean Glandular Dose in Diagnostic Mammography in China
    Du Xiang
    Wang Jin
    Yang Chun Yong
    Zhou Xian Feng
    Chen Wei
    Cao Xing Jiang
    Zhou Yuan Yuan
    Yu Ning Le
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 27 (05) : 396 - 399
  • [7] Estimation of mean glandular dose for mammography of augmented breasts
    Beckett, JR
    Kotre, CJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11): : 3241 - 3252
  • [8] A Methodology for Obtaining the Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography Exams
    Feital, J. C.
    Delgado, J. U.
    Lopes, R. T.
    [J]. VII BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON METROLOGY (METROLOGIA 2013), 2015, 575
  • [9] Investigation of Mean Glandular Dose in Diagnostic Mammography in China
    DU Xiang
    WANG Jin
    YANG Chun Yong
    ZHOU Xian Feng
    CHEN Wei
    CAO Xing Jiang
    ZHOU Yuan Yuan
    YU Ning Le
    [J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27 (05) : 396 - 399
  • [10] A Mammography Phantom to Measure Mean Glandular Dose and Image Quality
    Lopez-Pineda, E.
    Ruiz-Trejo, C.
    Brandan, M. E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06)