Bilateral comparison of luminous flux (EURAMET.PR-K4.3)

被引：0
|
作者：
Pons, Alicia [1 ]
Campos, Joaquin [1 ]
Sametoglu, Ferhat [2 ]
机构：
[1] CSIC, IO, Inst Opt Daza de Valdes, C Serrano 144, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] Opt Labs, Dr Zeki Acar Cad 1,TUBITAK Gebze Yerleskesi, TR-41470 Kocaeli, Turkey
来源：
METROLOGIA | 2019年 / 56卷 / 1A期
关键词：
Luminous flux; PR K4; Bilateral Comparison;
D O I：
10.1088/0026-1394/56/1A/02003
中图分类号：
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号：
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要：
This report gives the result of a bilateral comparison of luminous flux between the Instituto de Optica, IO-CSIC (Spain) and the Ulusal Metroloji Enstitusu, TUBITAK UME (Turkey). This bilateral comparison is intended to link the TUBITAK UME realized lumen to the CCPR K4 reference value. The measurement artefacts were specially developed transfer standard lamps for luminous flux of the Polaron LF200W type. The comparison and its protocol were approved by the CCPR and registered with KCDB with the comparison number: EURAMET.PR-K4.3.
引用
下载
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Final Report of the APMP Comparison of Luminous Responsivity APMP.PR-K3.b
    Gardner, J. L.
    Atkinson, E.
    METROLOGIA, 2004, 41
  • [22] Final report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 comparison of spectral irradiance 250 nm-2500 nm
    Goodman, Teresa
    Servantes, William
    Woolliams, Emma
    Sperfeld, Peter
    Simionescu, Mihai
    Blattner, Peter
    Kallberg, Stefan
    Khlevnoy, Boris
    Dekker, Paul
    METROLOGIA, 2015, 52
  • [23] Report on key comparison EURAMET.EM-K11
    Rydler, Karl-Erik
    Tarasso, Valter
    METROLOGIA, 2011, 48
  • [24] Bilateral key comparison EURAMET.EM-K11.1 "AC-DC Voltage Transfer Difference at Low Voltages"
    不详
    METROLOGIA, 2022, 59 (1A)
  • [25] EURAMET.L-K3.2009.2 Angle comparison using an autocollimator Bilateral follow-up comparison between PTB and METAS Final
    Thalmann, R.
    Just, A.
    Geckeler, R.
    METROLOGIA, 2018, 55
  • [26] EURAMET key comparison 1031 (EURAMETMD-K1.1)-solid density comparison
    Bettin, Horst
    Borys, Michael
    Firlus, Martin
    Buchner, Christian
    Zelenka, Zoltan
    Medina, Nieves
    Parlic-Risovic, Tijana
    Bezjak, Mladen
    Mitsas, Chris
    Lefkopoulos, Alexandros
    Lenard, Elzbieta
    Popa, George Florian
    Malengo, Andrea
    Madec, Tanguy
    Beaudoux, Florian
    Fuchs, Peter
    Marti, Kilian
    Wuthrich, Christian
    Kajastie, Heikki
    Eltawil, Alaaeldin A.
    Fujii, Ken-ichi
    Kuramoto, Naoki
    Waseda, Atsushi
    Perkin, Michael
    Davidson, Stuart
    Acadag, Umit Y.
    Domostroev, Aleksey
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (1A)
  • [27] Key Comparison EURAMET.EM-K5.1 EURAMET Project No. 687 Comparison of 50/60 Hz Power Final Report
    Cayci, Huseyin
    METROLOGIA, 2011, 48
  • [28] EURAMET 1195: Bilateral comparison of liquefied hydrocarbon mixtures in constant pressure (piston) cylinders
    Brown, Andrew S.
    Downey, Michael L.
    Milton, Martin J. T.
    van der Veen, Adriaan M. H.
    Zalewska, Ewelina T.
    Li, Jianrong
    METROLOGIA, 2013, 50
  • [29] COMPARISON ON TOTAL LUMINOUS FLUX MEASUREMENT OF SPECTROGONIOPHOTOMETER AND GONIOPHOTOMETER
    Zhao, W.
    Hui, L.
    Jian, L.
    Haisu, Z.
    Tong, C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CIE CENTENARY CONFERENCE TOWARDS A NEW CENTURY OF LIGHT, 2013, : 634 - 636
  • [30] EURAMET-T.K9.1 bilateral comparison of ITS-90 SPRT calibration from the Hg TP to Zn FP
    Olsen, Age Andreas Falnes
    Opel, Karsten
    Tammik, Kristjan
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (1A)
12345