Genetic Programming with Rademacher Complexity for Symbolic Regression

被引:0
|
作者
Raymond, Christian [1 ]
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Xue, Bing [1 ]
Zhang, Mengjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Wellinton, New Zealand
关键词
genetic programming; symbolic regression; generalization; structural risk minimization; Rademacher complexity;
D O I
10.1109/cec.2019.8790341
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Genetic Programming (GP) for symbolic regression is often prone to overfitting the training data, causing poor performance on unseen data. A number of recent works in the field have been devoted to regulating this problem by investigating both the structural and functional complexity of GP individuals during the evolutionary process. This work uses the Rademacher complexity and incorporates it into the fitness function of GP, utilising it as a means of controlling the functional complexity of GP individuals. The experiment results confirm that the new GP method has a notable generalization gain compared to the standard GP and Support Vector Regression (SVR) in most of the considered problems. Further investigations also show that the new GP method generates symbolic regression models that could not only release the overfitting trend in standard GP but also are significantly smaller in size compared to their counterparts in standard GP.
引用
收藏
页码:2657 / 2664
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Instance based Transfer Learning for Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. 2019 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2019, : 3006 - 3013
  • [42] Transformation of CPS coordinates using symbolic regression and genetic programming
    Chou, HJ
    Wu, CH
    Su, WH
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, 2005, : 301 - 306
  • [43] A Comparative Study on the Numerical Performance of Kaizen Programming and Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems
    Ferreira, Jimena
    Ines Torres, Ana
    Pedemonte, Martin
    [J]. 2019 IEEE LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (LA-CCI), 2019, : 202 - 207
  • [44] Parallel implementation of a genetic-programming based tool for symbolic regression
    Salhi, A
    Glaser, H
    De Roure, D
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1998, 66 (06) : 299 - 307
  • [45] LGP-VEC: A Vectorial Linear Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Gligorovski, Nikola
    Zhong, Jinghui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2023 COMPANION, 2023, : 579 - 582
  • [46] Parsimony Measures in Multi-objective Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Burlacu, Bogdan
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    Kommenda, Michael
    Affenzeller, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 338 - 339
  • [47] BASELINE GENETIC PROGRAMMING: SYMBOLIC REGRESSION ON BENCHMARKS FOR SENSORY EVALUATION MODELING
    Noel, Pierre-Luc
    Veeramachaneni, Kalyan
    O'Reilly, Una-May
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING THEORY AND PRACTICE IX, 2011, : 173 - 194
  • [48] GPTIPS: An Open Source Genetic Programming Toolbox For Multigene Symbolic Regression
    Searson, Dominic P.
    Leahy, David E.
    Willis, Mark J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS (IMECS 2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, : 77 - +
  • [49] Genetic programming performance prediction and its application for symbolic regression problems
    Astarabadi, Samaneh Sadat Mousavi
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 502 : 418 - 433
  • [50] A Hybrid Grammar-based Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems
    Motta, Flavio A. A.
    de Freitas, Joao M.
    de Souza, Felipe R.
    Bernardino, Heder S.
    de Oliveira, Itamar L.
    Barbosa, Helio J. C.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2018, : 2097 - 2104