Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study

被引:27
|
作者
Hendriks, Gijs A. G. M. [1 ]
Hollander, Branislav [1 ]
Menssen, Jan [1 ]
Milkowski, Andy [2 ]
Hansen, Hendrik H. G. [1 ]
de Korte, Chris L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med UltraSound Imaging Ctr MUSIC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Siemens Ultrasound, Issaquah, WA USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2016年 / 61卷 / 07期
关键词
3D elastography; strain; ultrasound; ABVS; breast cancer; plane wave; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; DENSITY; VECTOR; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/7/2665
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In breast cancer screening, the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) was introduced as an alternative for mammography since the latter technique is less suitable for women with dense breasts. Although clinical studies show promising results, clinicians report two disadvantages: long acquisition times (> 90 s) introducing breathing artefacts, and high recall rates due to detection of many small lesions of uncertain malignant potential. Technical improvements for faster image acquisition and better discrimination between benign and malignant lesions are thus required. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate if 3D ultrasound elastography using plane-wave imaging is feasible. Strain images of a breast elastography phantom were acquired by an ABVS-mimicking device that allowed axial and elevational movement of the attached transducer. Pre-and post-deformation volumes were acquired with different constant speeds (between 1.25 and 40.0 mm s(-1)) and by three protocols: Go-Go (pre-and post-volumes with identical start and end positions), Go-Return (similar to Go-Go with opposite scanning directions) and Control (pre-and post-volumes acquired per position, this protocol can be seen as reference). Afterwards, 2D and 3D cross-correlation and strain algorithms were applied to the acquired volumes and the results were compared. The Go-Go protocol was shown to be superior with better strain image quality (CNRe and SNRe) than Go-Return and to be similar as Control. This can be attributed to applying opposite mechanical forces to the phantom during the Go-Return protocol, leading to out-of-plane motion. This motion was partly compensated by using 3D cross-correlation. However, the quality was still inferior to Go-Go. Since these results were obtained in a phantom study with controlled deformations, the effect of possible uncontrolled in vivo tissue motion artefacts has to be addressed in future studies. In conclusion, it seems feasible to implement 3D ultrasound quasi-static elastography on an ABVS-like system and to reduce scan times within one breath-hold (similar to 10 s) by plane-wave acquisitions.
引用
收藏
页码:2665 / 2679
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing QA and QC protocols for 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS)
    Moreno, Clara Marquez
    Payne, Nicholas
    Morrish, Oliver
    Gilbert, Fiona
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [32] Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound
    Kapur, A
    Carson, PL
    Eberhard, J
    Goodsitt, MM
    Thomenius, K
    Lokhandwalla, M
    Buckley, D
    Roubidoux, MA
    Helvie, MA
    Booi, RC
    LeCarpentier, GL
    Erkamp, RQ
    Chan, HP
    Fowlkes, JB
    Thomas, JA
    Landberg, CE
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2004, 3 (04) : 325 - 334
  • [33] Different Types of Ultrasound Probes Usage for Multi-Angle Conventional 3D Ultrasound Compound Imaging: A Breast Phantom Study
    Sabiniok, Maciej
    Opielinski, Krzysztof J.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [34] Deep learning-based breast lesion localization and segmentation in 3d automated breast ultrasound (3d abus) images
    Lertsatittanakron, S.
    Thongchai, P.
    Chaicharoen, P.
    Arora, R.
    Siripaibun, J.
    Kummanee, P.
    Pharksuwan, P.
    Fuangrod, T.
    BREAST, 2023, 68 : S114 - S115
  • [35] A Phantom Validation Study of a 3D Background Phase Model for MR Thermometry
    Yung, J.
    Fuentes, D.
    Hazle, J.
    Stafford, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3664 - 3664
  • [36] Comparing portable and clinical ultrasound systems using 3D printed breast phantom inserts
    Valdez, Dustin
    Fukui, Jami
    Wolfgruber, Thomas
    Leong, Lambert
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Shepherd, John
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [37] 3D TENDON STRAIN ESTIMATION ON HIGH-FREQUENCY 3D ULTRASOUND IMAGES A SIMULATION AND PHANTOM STUDY
    Carvalho, C.
    Bogaerts, S.
    Scheys, L.
    D'hooge, J.
    Peers, K.
    Suetens, P.
    2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 172 - 175
  • [38] 3D Breast Digital Phantom for XACT Imaging
    Tang, S.
    Chen, Y.
    Ahmad, S.
    Yang, K.
    Laaroussi, R.
    Chen, J.
    Samant, P.
    Xiang, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3389 - 3389
  • [39] Development of a physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Bakic, Predrag
    Ullberg, Christer
    Derand, Helen
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (02) : 891 - 896
  • [40] 3D Printed ABS Breast Phantom for GammaPod
    Becker, S.
    Stump, K.
    Culberson, W.
    Poirier, Y.
    Zhang, H.
    Guerrero, M.
    Yi, B.
    Nichols, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E953 - E954