Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study

被引:27
|
作者
Hendriks, Gijs A. G. M. [1 ]
Hollander, Branislav [1 ]
Menssen, Jan [1 ]
Milkowski, Andy [2 ]
Hansen, Hendrik H. G. [1 ]
de Korte, Chris L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med UltraSound Imaging Ctr MUSIC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Siemens Ultrasound, Issaquah, WA USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2016年 / 61卷 / 07期
关键词
3D elastography; strain; ultrasound; ABVS; breast cancer; plane wave; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; DENSITY; VECTOR; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/7/2665
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In breast cancer screening, the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) was introduced as an alternative for mammography since the latter technique is less suitable for women with dense breasts. Although clinical studies show promising results, clinicians report two disadvantages: long acquisition times (> 90 s) introducing breathing artefacts, and high recall rates due to detection of many small lesions of uncertain malignant potential. Technical improvements for faster image acquisition and better discrimination between benign and malignant lesions are thus required. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate if 3D ultrasound elastography using plane-wave imaging is feasible. Strain images of a breast elastography phantom were acquired by an ABVS-mimicking device that allowed axial and elevational movement of the attached transducer. Pre-and post-deformation volumes were acquired with different constant speeds (between 1.25 and 40.0 mm s(-1)) and by three protocols: Go-Go (pre-and post-volumes with identical start and end positions), Go-Return (similar to Go-Go with opposite scanning directions) and Control (pre-and post-volumes acquired per position, this protocol can be seen as reference). Afterwards, 2D and 3D cross-correlation and strain algorithms were applied to the acquired volumes and the results were compared. The Go-Go protocol was shown to be superior with better strain image quality (CNRe and SNRe) than Go-Return and to be similar as Control. This can be attributed to applying opposite mechanical forces to the phantom during the Go-Return protocol, leading to out-of-plane motion. This motion was partly compensated by using 3D cross-correlation. However, the quality was still inferior to Go-Go. Since these results were obtained in a phantom study with controlled deformations, the effect of possible uncontrolled in vivo tissue motion artefacts has to be addressed in future studies. In conclusion, it seems feasible to implement 3D ultrasound quasi-static elastography on an ABVS-like system and to reduce scan times within one breath-hold (similar to 10 s) by plane-wave acquisitions.
引用
收藏
页码:2665 / 2679
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Realization of automated whole breast 3D Doppler ultrasound for characterization of breast lesions
    Aziz, Amal
    Rahman, R. Abdul
    Park, C. K.
    Trumpour, T.
    Bax, J.
    Gardi, L.
    Tessier, D.
    Barker, K.
    Poepping, T.
    Fenster, A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2024: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2024, 12932
  • [22] Cross-Validation of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Ultrasound-Based Transient Elastography: A Preliminary Phantom Study
    Oudry, Jennifer
    Chen, Jun
    Glaser, Kevin J.
    Miette, Veronique
    Sandrin, Laurent
    Ehman, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (05) : 1145 - 1150
  • [23] 3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom
    Matrosic, Charles K.
    Culberson, Wesley
    Shepard, Andrew
    Jupitz, Sydney
    Bednarz, Bryan
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 84 : 159 - 167
  • [24] Design and development of a 3D Ultrasound phantom scanner
    Hammer, SJ
    Beech-Brandt, J
    Chen, C
    Poepping, TL
    Easson, WJ
    Hoskins, PR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 : 1184 - 1187
  • [25] Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound
    Kotsianos-Hermle, D.
    Hiltawsky, K. M.
    Wirth, S.
    Fischer, T.
    Friese, K.
    Reiser, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [26] Toward point-of-care breast cancer diagnosis: Validation of a spatially tracked automated 3D ultrasound system
    Park, Claire
    Papernick, S.
    Orlando, N.
    Jonnalagadda, M.
    Bax, J.
    Gardi, L.
    Barker, K.
    Tessier, D.
    Fenster, A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 12038
  • [27] Patient experience with automated SoftVue 3D whole breast tomographic ultrasound
    Yamashita, Mary
    Brem, Rachel F.
    Baker, Lauren
    Mahoney, Taylor F.
    Walker, Patrick
    Treat, Rachel M.
    Larsen, Linda Hovanessian
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [28] Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation for assistant diagnosis of breast cancer
    Wang, Yuxin
    Gu, Peng
    Lee, Won-Mean
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Du, Sidan
    Yuan, Jie
    Wang, Xueding
    Carson, Paul L.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 9790
  • [29] Validation of 3D EM Reconstructions: The Phantom in the Noise
    Heymann, J. Bernard
    AIMS BIOPHYSICS, 2015, 2 (01): : 21 - 35
  • [30] Finding Lesion Correspondences in Different Views of Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound
    Tan, Tao
    Platel, Bram
    Hicks, Michael
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 8670