Planning complementary conservation of crop wild relative diversity in southern Africa

被引:13
|
作者
Brehm, Joana Magos [1 ]
Gaisberger, Hannes [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kell, Shelagh [1 ]
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio [5 ]
Thormann, Imke [2 ,3 ]
Dulloo, Mohammad Ehsan [6 ,7 ]
Maxted, Nigel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Alliance Biovers Int, Rome, Italy
[3] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rome, Italy
[4] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Ciudad Univ, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Alliance Biovers Int, Rose Hill, Mauritius
[7] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rose Hill, Mauritius
关键词
CAPFITOGEN; climate change analysis; conservation planning; crop wild relatives; diversity analysis; ex situ; gap analysis; genetic conservation; in situ; species distribution modelling; IN-SITU CONSERVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; INVENTORY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13512
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To identify priority areas for in situ conservation and collection of germplasm for ex situ backup of crop wild relative (CWR) diversity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region as part of an action plan for the conservation and use of the region's important CWR diversity. Location SADC region. Methods Diversity, gap and climate change analyses at species and ecogeographic diversity levels were undertaken for 113 regional priority CWR taxa. Results CWR hotspots were identified in Eswatini (former Swaziland), Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Twenty-one per cent of regionally priority CWR occur exclusively outside existing protected areas (PAs), 50% are not conserved ex situ, and 64% are predicted to be negatively impacted by climate change. A total of 120 existing PAs in 13 countries were identified as containing populations likely to persist in the future for 80% of CWR taxa and about 50% of the ecogeographic diversity of these taxa; remaining diversity can be conserved in an additional 151 complementary sites in 11 countries. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, South Africa and Tanzania contain important areas for conserving CWR diversity in situ in which no negative climate change impact is predicted. Priority CWR diversity in the provinces of Bas-Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Cabinda (Angola) is threatened by climate change and should be collected urgently for ex situ conservation. Other areas rich in ecogeographic diversity that is not conserved ex situ are located in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Main conclusions We identified 120 PAs and 151 complementary sites outside of PAs in 13 SADC countries that could form the basis of the SADC Network for In Situ Conservation of CWR. We also selected priority areas for filling gaps in ex situ collections and for field survey.
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1372
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conservation of crop wild relative diversity in Northeast Africa: Checklist and prioritization
    Aldow, Ahmed
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Kordofani, Maha
    Abdoul-latif, Fatouma
    Maxted, Nigel
    CROP SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (06) : 3430 - 3442
  • [2] Towards the conservation of crop wild relative diversity in North Africa: checklist, prioritisation and inventory
    Sami Lala
    Ahmed Amri
    Nigel Maxted
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2018, 65 : 113 - 124
  • [3] Towards the conservation of crop wild relative diversity in North Africa: checklist, prioritisation and inventory
    Lala, Sami
    Amri, Ahmed
    Maxted, Nigel
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2018, 65 (01) : 113 - 124
  • [4] New tools for crop wild relative conservation planning
    Brehm, J. Magos
    Kell, S.
    Thormann, I
    Gaisberger, H.
    Dulloo, M. E.
    Maxted, N.
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2019, 17 (02): : 208 - 212
  • [5] Toward the Systematic Conservation of Global Crop Wild Relative Diversity
    Maxted, Nigel
    Kell, Shelagh
    Ford-Lloyd, Brian
    Dulloo, Ehsan
    Toledo, Alvaro
    CROP SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (02) : 774 - 785
  • [6] Climate change and national crop wild relative conservation planning
    Phillips, Jade
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    van Oort, Bob
    Asdal, Asmund
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Maxted, Nigel
    AMBIO, 2017, 46 (06) : 630 - 643
  • [7] Climate change and national crop wild relative conservation planning
    Jade Phillips
    Joana Magos Brehm
    Bob van Oort
    Åsmund Asdal
    Morten Rasmussen
    Nigel Maxted
    Ambio, 2017, 46 : 630 - 643
  • [8] The African wild dog - conservation planning for Southern Africa
    Woodroffe, R
    ORYX, 1998, 32 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [9] Genetic Reserve Conservation of European Crop Wild Relative and Landrace Diversity
    Frese, L.
    Bjorn, G. K.
    Branca, F.
    Ford-Lloyd, B. V.
    Germeier, C. U.
    Iriondo, J. M.
    Katsiotis, A.
    Kell, S. P.
    Maxted, N.
    Negri, V.
    Pinheiro de Carvalho, M. A. A.
    AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : 1 - 6
  • [10] A regional approach to Nordic crop wild relative in situ conservation planning
    Fitzgerald, Hell
    Palme, Anna
    Asdal, Asmund
    Endresen, Dag
    Kiviharju, Elina
    Lund, Birgitte
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Thorbjornsson, Hjortur
    Weibull, Jens
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2019, 17 (02): : 196 - 207