From Hearing with a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid (CI/HA) to Hearing with Two Cochlear Implants (CI/CI): A Within-Subject Design Comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Luntz, Michal [1 ]
Egra-Dagan, Dana [1 ,2 ]
Attias, Joseph [2 ]
Yehudai, Noam [1 ]
Most, Tova [3 ]
Shpak, Talma [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Bnai Zion Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg,Ear & Hearing P, IL-31048 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Commun Disorders, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Bilateral cochlear implantation; Bimodal hearing; Binaural; SPEECH RECOGNITION; BIMODAL HEARING; SPATIAL HEARING; ONE EAR; PERCEPTION; LOCALIZATION; BENEFITS; ADULTS; STIMULATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare within-subject bilateral-binaural and bimodal complementary abilities between bimodal (cochlear implant and hearing aid; CI/HA) and bilateral CI hearing (CI/CI), thereby enabling better-informed counseling of experienced CI/HA users contemplating contralateral implantation. Study Design: Comparative within-subject case review. Setting: Outpatient hearing clinic. Patients: Ten experienced adult CI/HA users with severe-to-profound hearing loss in the HA ear, who converted to CI/CI between 2 and 11 years after initial implantation. Intervention: Task-specific testing of bilateral-binaural hearing (sound lateralization, binaural summation/redundancy/unmasking, head-shadow effect), bimodal complementary benefit (contribution of low-frequency information), and a self-report Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire, all before and 1 year after contralateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Test result differences between CI/HA and CI/CI conditions. Results: CI/CI hearing was better than CI/HA for speech lateralization and for perception of semantically unpredictable sentences in speech noise with speech at 0 degrees and noise at +90 degrees azimuth on the old CI side. CI/HA was better than CI/CI only for differences between perception of natural prosody speech and of speech with flattened fundamental frequency (F0) contour with speech and noise in front (at 0 degrees azimuth). Total scores on the SSQ questionnaire were higher in CI/CI than in CI/HA users. Conclusion: Counseling regarding contralateral implantation for CI/HA users with severe-to-profound hearing loss in the HA ear, though generally positive, should consider individual functional needs, and cover expectations about the expected trade-off between gaining improved understanding and speech lateralization in challenging listening conditions and losing some low-frequency cues still available with CI/HA hearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1690
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Kessler, David M.
    Wolfe, Jace
    Blanchard, Michelle
    Gifford, Rene H.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 63 (05): : 1561 - 1571
  • [42] Localization of Low- and High-Frequency Sounds in Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Zelger, Philipp
    Zorowka, Patrick
    Schmutzhard, Joachim
    Galvan, Oliver
    Rossi, Sonja
    Stephan, Kurt
    Seebacher, Josef
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (03) : e228 - e233
  • [43] Two-Year Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Use for Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss: Benefits and Comparison to Children With Normal Hearing
    Park, Lisa R. R.
    Dillon, Margaret T. T.
    Buss, Emily
    Brown, Kevin D. D.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (05): : 955 - 968
  • [44] Speech and language development in children with profound prelingual sensory-neural hearing loss. Comparison of cochlear implant and hearing aid users
    Stagiopoulos, P.
    Kyriafinis, G.
    Konstantinidis, I
    Psillas, G.
    Vital, V.
    Tsalighopoulos, M.
    10TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON PAEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2011, : 251 - 256
  • [45] Comparison of cochlear implant with hearing aid in children of congenital diapharagmatic hernia who developed progressive deafness
    Akamatsu, Y.
    Ogata, E.
    Yamasoba, T.
    Kaga, K.
    Ihara, M.
    Uchiyama, T.
    Tokumitsu, H.
    Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implant and Related Sciences, 2005, : 5 - 9
  • [46] Bimodal Benefits for Lexical Tone Recognition: An Investigation on Mandarin-speaking Preschoolers with a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhang, Jing
    Ding, Hongwei
    Zhang, Yang
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [47] Diffusion tensor imaging of the auditory neural pathway for clinical outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) of pediatric congenital sensorineural hearing loss patients
    Huang, L.
    Zheng, W.
    Wu, C.
    Wu, X.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 22 : 329 - 330
  • [48] Reduction in High-Frequency Hearing Aid Gain Can Improve Performance in Patients With Contralateral Cochlear Implant: A Pilot Study
    Messersmith, Jessica J.
    Jorgensen, Lindsey E.
    Hagg, Jessica A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 24 (04) : 462 - 468
  • [49] Bimodal Benefits Revealed by Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones in Mandarin-Speaking Kindergarteners With a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhang, Jing
    Peng, Gang
    Ding, Hongwei
    Zhang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 63 (12): : 4238 - 4251
  • [50] Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Waltzman, Susan B.
    Shapiro, William H.
    Neukam, Jonathan D.
    Zeman, Annette M.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2017, 21 : 1 - 14