From Hearing with a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid (CI/HA) to Hearing with Two Cochlear Implants (CI/CI): A Within-Subject Design Comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Luntz, Michal [1 ]
Egra-Dagan, Dana [1 ,2 ]
Attias, Joseph [2 ]
Yehudai, Noam [1 ]
Most, Tova [3 ]
Shpak, Talma [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Bnai Zion Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg,Ear & Hearing P, IL-31048 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Commun Disorders, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Bilateral cochlear implantation; Bimodal hearing; Binaural; SPEECH RECOGNITION; BIMODAL HEARING; SPATIAL HEARING; ONE EAR; PERCEPTION; LOCALIZATION; BENEFITS; ADULTS; STIMULATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare within-subject bilateral-binaural and bimodal complementary abilities between bimodal (cochlear implant and hearing aid; CI/HA) and bilateral CI hearing (CI/CI), thereby enabling better-informed counseling of experienced CI/HA users contemplating contralateral implantation. Study Design: Comparative within-subject case review. Setting: Outpatient hearing clinic. Patients: Ten experienced adult CI/HA users with severe-to-profound hearing loss in the HA ear, who converted to CI/CI between 2 and 11 years after initial implantation. Intervention: Task-specific testing of bilateral-binaural hearing (sound lateralization, binaural summation/redundancy/unmasking, head-shadow effect), bimodal complementary benefit (contribution of low-frequency information), and a self-report Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire, all before and 1 year after contralateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Test result differences between CI/HA and CI/CI conditions. Results: CI/CI hearing was better than CI/HA for speech lateralization and for perception of semantically unpredictable sentences in speech noise with speech at 0 degrees and noise at +90 degrees azimuth on the old CI side. CI/HA was better than CI/CI only for differences between perception of natural prosody speech and of speech with flattened fundamental frequency (F0) contour with speech and noise in front (at 0 degrees azimuth). Total scores on the SSQ questionnaire were higher in CI/CI than in CI/HA users. Conclusion: Counseling regarding contralateral implantation for CI/HA users with severe-to-profound hearing loss in the HA ear, though generally positive, should consider individual functional needs, and cover expectations about the expected trade-off between gaining improved understanding and speech lateralization in challenging listening conditions and losing some low-frequency cues still available with CI/HA hearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1690
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contralateral hearing aid use in adult cochlear implant recipients: retrospective analysis of auditory outcomes
    Mertens, Griet
    Andries, Ellen
    Clement, Charis
    Cochet, Ellen
    Hofkens-Van den Brandt, Anouk
    Jacquemin, Laure
    Joossen, Iris
    Vermeersch, Hanne
    Lammers, Marc Jan-Willem
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    Vanderveken, Olivier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (07) : 543 - 550
  • [32] Evaluation of the Bimodal Benefit in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Illg, Angelika
    Bojanowicz, Margarete
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Buechner, Andreas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (09) : E240 - E244
  • [33] Parental insights on Hearing Aid Usage in the ear Contralateral to unilateral Cochlear Implant among Children
    Sahana, P.
    Chaithra, M. C.
    Manjula, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 172
  • [34] Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Kessler, David M.
    Ananthakrishnan, Saradha
    Smith, Spencer B.
    D'Onofrio, Kristen
    Gifford, Rene H.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2020, 24
  • [35] Hearing Preservation Outcomes with Different Cochlear Implant Electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422
    Jurawitz, Marie-Charlot
    Buechner, Andreas
    Harpel, Theo
    Schuessler, Mark
    Majdani, Omid
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2014, 19 (05) : 293 - 309
  • [36] Preservation of cochlear structures and hearing when using the Nucleus Slim Straight (CI422) electrode in children
    Skarzynski, H.
    Matusiak, M.
    Lorens, A.
    Furmanek, M.
    Pilka, A.
    Skarzynski, P. H.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2016, 130 (04): : 332 - 339
  • [37] Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children
    Jafari, Narges
    Yadegari, Fariba
    Jalaie, Shohreh
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2016, 30 (06) : 763.e1 - 763.e7
  • [38] Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?
    Till F. Jakob
    Iva Speck
    Ann-Kathrin Rauch
    Frederike Hassepass
    Manuel C. Ketterer
    Rainer Beck
    Antje Aschendorff
    Thomas Wesarg
    Susan Arndt
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 149 - 158
  • [39] Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?
    Jakob, Till F.
    Speck, Iva
    Rauch, Ann-Kathrin
    Hassepass, Frederike
    Ketterer, Manuel C.
    Beck, Rainer
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Arndt, Susan
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [40] Comparative study on developmental milestones, adaptive behaviour and educational performance between a group of Spanish deaf children with cochlear implant (CI) respect to the hearing peers
    Jimenez, M. S.
    Pino, M. J.
    Herruzo, J.
    10TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON PAEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2011, : 245 - 249