Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review

被引:8
|
作者
Tsang, C. [1 ]
Lee, K. S. [2 ]
Richards, H. [1 ]
Blazeby, J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Avery, K. N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Ctr Surg Res, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; READMISSION; WEB;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraa072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Little is known about the electronic collection and clinical feedback of patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) following surgical discharge. This systematic review summarized the evidence on the collection and uses of electronic systems to collect PROs after discharge from hospital after surgery. Method: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to July 2019 using terms for `patient reported outcomes', 'electronic', 'surgery' and 'at home'. Primary research of all study designs was included if they used electronic systems to collect PRO data in adults after hospital discharge following surgery. Data were collected on the settings, patient groups and specialties, ePRO systems (including features and functions), PRO data collected, and integration with health records. Results: Fourteen studies were included from 9474 records, including two RCTs and six orthopaedic surgery studies. Most studies (9 of 14) used commercial ePRO systems. Six reported types of electronic device were used: tablets or other portable devices (3 studies), smartphones (2), combination of smartphones, tablets, portable devices and computers (1). Systems had limited features and functions such as real-time clinical feedback (6 studies) and messaging service for patients with care teams (3). No study described ePRO system integration with electronic health records to support clinical feedback. Conclusion: There is limited reporting of ePRO systems in the surgical literature, and ePRO systems lack integration with hospital clinical systems. Future research should describe the ePRO system and ePRO questionnaires used, and challenges encountered during the study, to support efficient upscaling of ePRO systems using tried and tested approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Review of 2699 Cases
    Sunderland, Geraint
    Foster, Mitchell
    Dheerendra, Sujay
    Pillay, Robin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (02) : 172 - 179
  • [32] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes after Lung Cancer Surgery
    Gazala, Sayf
    Pelletier, Jean-Sebastien
    Storie, Dale
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J.
    Bedard, Eric L. R.
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
  • [33] Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes
    Kara Schick-Makaroff
    Anita Molzahn
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13
  • [34] Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Molzahn, Anita
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [35] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review
    Mishra, Eleanor K.
    Stanton, Andrew
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [36] Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    Lotto, Lorella
    Giandomenico, Francesca
    Perin, Alessandro
    Pucciarelli, Salvatore
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (08) : 901 - 918
  • [37] Patient-reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Denys, Andreas
    van Nieuwenhove, Yves
    Van de Putte, Dirk
    Pape, Eva
    Pattyn, Piet
    Ceelen, Wim
    van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (04) : 353 - 368
  • [38] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review
    Ritschel, Michaela
    Kuske, Silke
    Gnass, Irmela
    Andrich, Silke
    Moschinski, Kai
    Borgmann, Sandra Olivia
    Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
    Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
    Wittgens, Charlotte
    Flohe, Sascha
    Sturm, Johannes
    Windolf, Joachim
    Icks, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [39] Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes after surgery
    Isacco Montroni
    Giampaolo Ugolini
    Riccardo A. Audisio
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2018, 30 : 259 - 262
  • [40] Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes after surgery
    Montroni, Isacco
    Ugolini, Giampaolo
    Audisio, Riccardo A.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 30 (03) : 259 - 262