Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Ritschel, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Kuske, Silke [3 ]
Gnass, Irmela [4 ]
Andrich, Silke [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Moschinski, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Borgmann, Sandra Olivia [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Herrmann-Frank, Annegret [1 ,2 ]
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti [6 ]
Wittgens, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
Flohe, Sascha [7 ,8 ]
Sturm, Johannes [9 ]
Windolf, Joachim [8 ]
Icks, Andrea [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Med Fac, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Fliedner Fachhochschule Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Nursing Sci & Practice, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Econ, German Diabet Ctr, Leibniz Ctr Diabet Res, Dusseldorf, Germany
[6] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Gen Practice, Fac Med, Cochrane Metab & Endocrine Disorders Grp, Dusseldorf, Germany
[7] Klinikum Solingen, Dept Trauma Orthopaed & Hand Surg, Solingen, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[9] Acad Trauma Surg GmbH, AUC, Munich, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; adult intensive & critical care; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; public health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS; MAJOR TRAUMA; MULTIPLE INJURIES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; REHABILITATION NEEDS; SCORING SYSTEMS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies. Design Systematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018. Eligibility criteria All original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18-75 years with an Injury Severity Score >= 16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale >= 3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies. Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently. Results The search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain. Conclusions There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017060825.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma: protocol for a systematic review
    Gnass, Irmela
    Ritschel, Michaela
    Andrich, Silke
    Kuske, Silke
    Moschinski, Kai
    Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
    Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
    Flohe, Sascha
    Sturm, Johannes
    Windolf, Joachim
    Icks, Andrea
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [2] Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Childhood Glaucoma
    Stingl, Julia V.
    Ortolano, Lorena Cascant
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Hoffmann, Esther M.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2024, 7 (04): : 391 - 400
  • [3] Assessment methods for patient-reported outcomes
    Hufford, MR
    Shiffman, S
    [J]. DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2003, 11 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [4] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in retinal diseases: a systematic review
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (04) : 546 - 582
  • [5] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes measures in heart failure: a systematic review
    Mendes, Joao Lazaro
    dos Santos, Cristina Mendes
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    [J]. HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2024, 29 (04) : 853 - 867
  • [6] Patient-reported outcomes for keloids: a systematic review
    Tan, Andrea
    Glass, Donald A., II
    [J]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2019, 154 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [7] Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
    Shisler, Robert
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Wang, Vivian
    Hebert, Courtney
    Salani, Ritu
    Felix, Ashley S.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (02) : 403 - 413
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Clara
    Sunu, Christine
    Pignone, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [9] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Harry C. Alexander
    Cindy H. Nguyen
    Matthew R. Moore
    Adam S. Bartlett
    Jacqueline A. Hannam
    Garth H. Poole
    Alan F. Merry
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2061 - 2071
  • [10] Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review
    Jacq, Gwenaelle
    Fontaine, Candice
    Legriel, Stephane
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 151