Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Ritschel, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Kuske, Silke [3 ]
Gnass, Irmela [4 ]
Andrich, Silke [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Moschinski, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Borgmann, Sandra Olivia [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Herrmann-Frank, Annegret [1 ,2 ]
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti [6 ]
Wittgens, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
Flohe, Sascha [7 ,8 ]
Sturm, Johannes [9 ]
Windolf, Joachim [8 ]
Icks, Andrea [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Med Fac, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Fliedner Fachhochschule Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Nursing Sci & Practice, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Econ, German Diabet Ctr, Leibniz Ctr Diabet Res, Dusseldorf, Germany
[6] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Gen Practice, Fac Med, Cochrane Metab & Endocrine Disorders Grp, Dusseldorf, Germany
[7] Klinikum Solingen, Dept Trauma Orthopaed & Hand Surg, Solingen, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[9] Acad Trauma Surg GmbH, AUC, Munich, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; adult intensive & critical care; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; public health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS; MAJOR TRAUMA; MULTIPLE INJURIES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; REHABILITATION NEEDS; SCORING SYSTEMS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies. Design Systematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018. Eligibility criteria All original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18-75 years with an Injury Severity Score >= 16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale >= 3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies. Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently. Results The search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain. Conclusions There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017060825.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Alexander, Harry C.
    Nguyen, Cindy H.
    Moore, Matthew R.
    Bartlett, Adam S.
    Hannam, Jacqueline A.
    Poole, Garth H.
    Merry, Alan F.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2061 - 2071
  • [12] Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease
    Grammati Sarri
    Menaka Bhor
    Seye Abogunrin
    Caroline Farmer
    Savita Nandal
    Rashid Halloway
    Dennis A. Revicki
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16
  • [13] Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease
    Sarri, Grammati
    Bhor, Menaka
    Abogunrin, Seye
    Farmer, Caroline
    Nandal, Savita
    Halloway, Rashid
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2018, 16
  • [14] Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments Preface
    Chung, Kevin C.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 40 (02) : XI - XII
  • [15] Review of the patient-reported outcomes instruments in ischemic heart disease
    Pardo, Yolanda
    Oriol, Cristina
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Alayo, Itxaso
    Zamora, Victor
    Ferrer, Montserrat
    Garin, Olatz
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S151 - S152
  • [16] Patient-reported outcomes assessment tools for use in psoriasis in Spain: A systematic review
    Lizan, L.
    Gabas-Rivera, C.
    Belinchon, I
    Dilla, T.
    Huete, T.
    Diaz, S.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2019, 110 (07): : 561 - 584
  • [17] Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review
    Kandel, Himal
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Goggin, Michael
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2017, 94 (12) : 1102 - 1119
  • [18] Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review
    Waljee, Jennifer
    McGlinn, Evan P.
    Sears, Erika Davis
    Chung, Kevin C.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2014, 155 (05) : 799 - 808
  • [19] FOUR DECADES OF RASCH ANALYSIS ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES INSTRUMENTS VALIDATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    de Bock, E.
    Williams, P.
    Tugaut, B.
    Guillemin, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A362 - A362
  • [20] Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments
    Hamzah, Jemaima Che
    Burr, Jennifer M.
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Prior, Maria
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (07) : 1141 - 1158