Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review

被引:8
|
作者
Tsang, C. [1 ]
Lee, K. S. [2 ]
Richards, H. [1 ]
Blazeby, J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Avery, K. N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Ctr Surg Res, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; READMISSION; WEB;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraa072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Little is known about the electronic collection and clinical feedback of patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) following surgical discharge. This systematic review summarized the evidence on the collection and uses of electronic systems to collect PROs after discharge from hospital after surgery. Method: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to July 2019 using terms for `patient reported outcomes', 'electronic', 'surgery' and 'at home'. Primary research of all study designs was included if they used electronic systems to collect PRO data in adults after hospital discharge following surgery. Data were collected on the settings, patient groups and specialties, ePRO systems (including features and functions), PRO data collected, and integration with health records. Results: Fourteen studies were included from 9474 records, including two RCTs and six orthopaedic surgery studies. Most studies (9 of 14) used commercial ePRO systems. Six reported types of electronic device were used: tablets or other portable devices (3 studies), smartphones (2), combination of smartphones, tablets, portable devices and computers (1). Systems had limited features and functions such as real-time clinical feedback (6 studies) and messaging service for patients with care teams (3). No study described ePRO system integration with electronic health records to support clinical feedback. Conclusion: There is limited reporting of ePRO systems in the surgical literature, and ePRO systems lack integration with hospital clinical systems. Future research should describe the ePRO system and ePRO questionnaires used, and challenges encountered during the study, to support efficient upscaling of ePRO systems using tried and tested approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
    Shisler, Robert
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Wang, Vivian
    Hebert, Courtney
    Salani, Ritu
    Felix, Ashley S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (02) : 403 - 413
  • [22] Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review
    Jacq, Gwenaelle
    Fontaine, Candice
    Legriel, Stephane
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 151
  • [23] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Clara
    Sunu, Christine
    Pignone, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [24] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Harry C. Alexander
    Cindy H. Nguyen
    Matthew R. Moore
    Adam S. Bartlett
    Jacqueline A. Hannam
    Garth H. Poole
    Alan F. Merry
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2061 - 2071
  • [25] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma: protocol for a systematic review
    Gnass, Irmela
    Ritschel, Michaela
    Andrich, Silke
    Kuske, Silke
    Moschinski, Kai
    Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
    Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
    Flohe, Sascha
    Sturm, Johannes
    Windolf, Joachim
    Icks, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [26] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Alexander, Harry C.
    Nguyen, Cindy H.
    Moore, Matthew R.
    Bartlett, Adam S.
    Hannam, Jacqueline A.
    Poole, Garth H.
    Merry, Alan F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2061 - 2071
  • [27] Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Post-bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    R. Salzillo
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2018, 42 : 1320 - 1330
  • [28] Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Post-bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Barone, M.
    Cogliandro, A.
    Salzillo, R.
    Tambone, V.
    Persichetti, P.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 42 (05) : 1320 - 1330
  • [29] The Psychosocial Patient-Reported Outcomes of End of Pathway Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Acum, Michelle
    Mastroyannopoulou, Kiki
    O'Curry, Sara
    Young, Judith
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (08): : 990 - 1007
  • [30] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in spine surgery: a systematic review
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Bawa, Mundeep S.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Bawa, Harmeet S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Wiggins, Adam B.
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (03) : 405 - 413