Evaluation of the effect of tooth and dental restoration material on electron dose distribution and production of photon contamination in electron beam radiotherapy

被引:3
|
作者
Toossi, Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni [1 ]
Ghorbani, Mahdi [1 ]
Akbari, Fatemeh [2 ]
Mehrpouyan, Mohammad [3 ,4 ]
Sabet, Leila Sobhkhiz [2 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Med Phys Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Reza Radiat Oncol Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Sabzevar Univ Med Sci, Bioinformat Res Ctr, Sabzevar, Iran
[4] Sabzevar Univ Med Sci, Radiol & Radiotherapy Dept, Fac Med, Sabzevar, Iran
关键词
Monte Carlo simulation; Electron mode; Tooth; Dental restoration material; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-015-0404-z
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of tooth and dental restoration materials on electron dose distribution and photon contamination production in electron beams of a medical linac. This evaluation was performed on 8, 12 and 14 MeV electron beams of a Siemens Primus linac. MCNPX Monte Carlo code was utilized and a 10 x 10 cm(2) applicator was simulated in the cases of tooth and combinations of tooth and Ceramco C3 ceramic veneer, tooth and Eclipse alloy and tooth and amalgam restoration materials in a soft tissue phantom. The relative electron and photon contamination doses were calculated for these materials. The presence of tooth and dental restoration material changed the electron dose distribution and photon contamination in phantom, depending on the type of the restoration material and electron beam's energy. The maximum relative electron dose was 1.07 in the presence of tooth including amalgam for 14 MeV electron beam. When 100.00 cGy was prescribed for the reference point, the maximum absolute electron dose was 105.10 cGy in the presence of amalgam for 12 MeV electron beam and the maximum absolute photon contamination dose was 376.67 mu Gy for tooth in 14 MeV electron beam. The change in electron dose distribution should be considered in treatment planning, when teeth are irradiated in electron beam radiotherapy. If treatment planning can be performed in such a way that the teeth are excluded from primary irradiation, the potential errors in dose delivery to the tumour and normal tissues can be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Effect of computed tomography number-relative electron density conversion curve on the calculation of radiotherapy dose and evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system
    Mohsen Hasani
    Bagher Farhood
    Mahdi Ghorbani
    Hamideh Naderi
    Sepideh Saadatmand
    Saeed Karimkhani Zandi
    Courtney Knaup
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2019, 42 : 489 - 502
  • [42] Effect of computed tomography number-relative electron density conversion curve on the calculation of radiotherapy dose and evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system
    Hasani, Mohsen
    Farhood, Bagher
    Ghorbani, Mahdi
    Naderi, Hamideh
    Saadatmand, Sepideh
    Zandi, Saeed Karimkhani
    Knaup, Courtney
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 42 (02) : 489 - 502
  • [43] Comment on "Effect of electron contamination on scatter correction factors for photon beam dosimetry" [Med. Phys. 26, 2099-2106 (1999)]
    Mihailidis, D
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) : 616 - 616
  • [44] Investigating the effect of dental implant materials with different densities on radiotherapy dose distribution using Monte-Carlo simulation and pencil beam convolution algorithm
    Akyol, Oya
    Dirican, Bahar
    Toklu, Turkay
    Eren, Hakan
    Olgar, Turan
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (04)
  • [45] Virtual unenhanced dual-energy computed tomography for photon radiotherapy: The effect on dose distribution and cone-beam computed tomography based position verification
    Afifah, Maryam
    Bulthuis, Marloes C.
    Goudschaal, Karin N.
    Verbeek-Spijkerman, Jolanda M.
    Rosario, Tezontl S.
    den Boer, Duncan
    Hinnen, Karel A.
    Bel, Arjan
    van Kesteren, Zdenko
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29