Dosimetric verification of IMRT and 3D conformal treatment delivery using EPID

被引:0
|
作者
Nasseri, S. [1 ]
Bahreyni, M. H. [1 ]
Momennezhad, M. [1 ,2 ]
Gholamhosseinian, H. [1 ]
Shahedi, F. [1 ]
Hashemi, S. M. [1 ]
Mohammadi, M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Med Phys Res Ctr, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Nucl Med Res Ctr, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Phys Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDS); Back-projection; Water equivalent path length; Digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR); ALGORITHM; EXIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110116
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Purpose: Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) could potentially be useful for either in-vivo or pre-treatment dosimetric verification of external beam radiation therapy. The accuracy of EPID for dosimetric purposes is highly dependent on the specific method used for the determination of dose-response characteristics. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and time-saving EPID back-projection dosimetry algorithm for 2D dose verification in 3D conformal and intensity-modulated beams.Methods: The procedure of dose reconstruction includes a first calibration step using ionization chamber measurements to convert the Electronic Portal Image (EPI) pixel values into an absorbed dose in water. Subsequently, several corrections were applied to the Portal Dose Images (PDIs) for the effect of field size, attenuator thickness, scattering radiation, beam hardening and EPID off-axis response. Furthermore, to consider tissue inhomogeneity for accurate dose reconstruction, the patient's water equivalent path length (WEPL) was calculated using a range of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) obtained at various thicknesses by Plastimatch software. The EPIDderived dose maps accuracy was assessed by comparing with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose in the prostate region of Alderson phantom irradiated with 3D conformal and intensity-modulated beams.Results: The gamma analysis for the dose plane showed agreements of 96.95% and 93.5% for 3D conformal and IMRT fields, respectively, with 3%/3 mm acceptance criteria.Conclusion: The presented algorithm can provide accurate absolute 2D dose maps for clinical use in the context of 3DCRT or IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) programs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SIMPLIFYING EPID DOSIMETRY FOR IMRT TREATMENT VERIFICATION
    Pecharroman-Gallego, R.
    Mans, A.
    Sonke, J. J.
    Stroom, J.
    van Herk, M.
    Mijnheer, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S95 - S96
  • [22] Simplifying EPID dosimetry for IMRT treatment verification
    Pecharroman-Gallego, R.
    Mans, Anton
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    Stroom, Joep C.
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, Igor
    van Herk, Marcel
    Mijnheer, Ben J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (02) : 983 - 992
  • [23] IS IMRT BETTER THAN 3D CONFORMAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER? A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON
    Buckey, C.
    Stathakis, S.
    Swanson, G.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Su, F. C.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S332 - S332
  • [24] Dosimetric comparison of pelvic IMRT with 3D conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies
    Ercan, T.
    Igdem, S.
    Alco, G.
    Zengin, F.
    Ozgules, R.
    Ober, A.
    Turkan, S.
    Okkan, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S207 - S207
  • [25] Dosimetric Comparison Among 3D Conformal, IMRT, and Phase-Average Compensators for SBRT Treatment Planning
    Vazquez, Luis
    Gutierrez, A.
    Stathakis, S.
    Roland, Teboh
    Esquivel, C.
    Shi, C.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 2668 - +
  • [26] Is there a role for IMRT in bilateral breast cancer? Dosimetric comparison of IMRT and standard 3D conformal radiation therapy
    Seguro Fernandez, A.
    Diaz Gomez, L.
    Urena Llinares, A.
    Gonzalez Calvo, E.
    Ramos Caballero, L. J.
    Diaz Diaz, V.
    Villanego Beltran, I.
    Iborra Oquendo, M. A.
    Sales Buzon, M. G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S236 - S236
  • [27] IMRT Verification Using the On-Board EPID
    Dormer, J.
    Witztum, A.
    Ding, X.
    Jin, P.
    Zhu, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 335 - 335
  • [28] Dosimetric verification of a commercial 3D treatment planning system for conformal radiotherapy with a dynamic multileaf collimator
    Pignoli, E
    Serretiello, S
    Somigliana, A
    Zonca, G
    Pellegrini, R
    Mongioj, V
    Marchesini, R
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08): : N77 - N84
  • [29] Detection of IMRT delivery errors using a quantitative 2D dosimetric verification system
    Childress, NL
    Bloch, C
    White, RA
    Salehpour, M
    Rosen, II
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (01) : 153 - 162
  • [30] IMRT in the treatment of anal cancer: A dosimetric comparison of conventional 3D, IMRT, and IMRT with integrated boost
    Hsu, A.
    Hara, W.
    Pawlicki, T.
    Bazan, J.
    Koong, A.
    Goodman, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S674 - S674