Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study

被引:3
|
作者
Ruan, Si-Min [1 ]
Cheng, Mei-Qing [1 ]
Huang, Hui [1 ]
Hu, Hang-Tong [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [1 ]
Lu, Ming-De [1 ,2 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Man-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; treatment response; hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; DRUG-ELUTING BEADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.2147/JHC.S353914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2???6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (??, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combination of CT/MRI LI-RADS With Second-Line Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Sulfur Hexafluoride or Perfluorobutane for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients
    Li, Yu
    Li, Sheng
    Li, Qing
    Li, Kai
    Han, Jing
    Mao, Siyue
    Xu, Xiaohong
    Su, Zhongzhen
    Zuo, Yanling
    Xie, Shousong
    Wen, Hong
    Zou, Xuebin
    Shen, Jingxian
    Li, Lingling
    Zhou, Jianhua
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 26 (04) : 346 - 359
  • [42] Surveillance for malignant progression of LI-RADS version 2017 category 3/4 nodules using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Hui Huang
    Chao-qun Li
    Dan-ni He
    Si-min Ruan
    Ming-de Li
    Mei-qing Cheng
    Ming-de Lu
    Ming Kuang
    Wei Wang
    Ying Wang
    Li-da Chen
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 9336 - 9346
  • [43] Surveillance for malignant progression of LI-RADS version 2017 category 3/4 nodules using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Huang, Hui
    Li, Chao-qun
    He, Dan-ni
    Ruan, Si-min
    Lu, Ming-de
    Cheng, Mei-qing
    Lu, Ming-de
    Kuang, Ming
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Ying
    Chen, Li-da
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (12) : 9336 - 9346
  • [44] Comparison between M-score and LR-M in the reporting system of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS
    Li-Da Chen
    Si-Min Ruan
    Yuan Lin
    Jin-Yu Liang
    Shun-Li Shen
    Hang-Tong Hu
    Yang Huang
    Wei Li
    Zhu Wang
    Xiao-Yan Xie
    Ming-De Lu
    Ming Kuang
    Wei Wang
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 4249 - 4257
  • [45] Comparison between M-score and LR-M in the reporting system of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS
    Chen, Li-Da
    Ruan, Si-Min
    Lin, Yuan
    Liang, Jin-Yu
    Shen, Shun-Li
    Hu, Hang-Tong
    Huang, Yang
    Li, Wei
    Wang, Zhu
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Lu, Ming-De
    Kuang, Ming
    Wang, Wei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (08) : 4249 - 4257
  • [46] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI
    Park, Sungeun
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Kim, Se Woo
    Lee, Jeong Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (03) : 554 - 561
  • [47] Using Contrast-enhanced US for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment: Contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS version 2017 Classification Is Diagnostically Accurate
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 308 - 309
  • [48] CT/MRI technical pitfalls for diagnosis and treatment response assessment using LI-RADS and how to optimize
    Kamal, Omar
    Haghshomar, Maryam
    Yang, Jessica
    Lalani, Tasneem
    Bijan, Bijan
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    Hong, Cheng William
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Kambadakone, Avinash
    Lee, James
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Fung, Alice
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 2022 - 2037
  • [49] LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: The Evidence Is Accumulating
    Do, Richard K.
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 327 - 328
  • [50] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 in Hepatic Tuberculosis: Case Report and Literature Review of Imaging Features
    Forgione, Antonella
    Tovoli, Francesco
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Renzulli, Matteo
    Vasuri, Francesco
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Granito, Alessandro
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2021, 12 (01) : 1 - 9