Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study

被引:3
|
作者
Ruan, Si-Min [1 ]
Cheng, Mei-Qing [1 ]
Huang, Hui [1 ]
Hu, Hang-Tong [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [1 ]
Lu, Ming-De [1 ,2 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Man-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; treatment response; hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; DRUG-ELUTING BEADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.2147/JHC.S353914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2???6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (??, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of intravascular perfusion based contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zuo, Dongsheng
    Yang, Kefeng
    Wu, Size
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2021, 78 (04) : 429 - 437
  • [22] LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Agnello, Francesco
    Cannella, Roberto
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (11): : 1575 - 1586
  • [23] IMPACT OF REVISION OF THE LR-M CRITERIA ON THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Qin, Zhengyi
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhou, Hongyu
    Zhang, Qin
    Wang, Yandong
    Jing, Xiang
    Wang, Fengmei
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 47 (12): : 3403 - 3410
  • [24] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Kono, Yuko
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Vezeridis, Alexander
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (04) : 861 - 879
  • [25] Training on contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS classification for resident radiologists: a retrospective comparison of performance after training
    Dai, Ting
    Zhu, Hongjing
    Qiao, Meng
    Song, Yuxuan
    Sun, Yu
    Meng, Xia
    Sun, Zhixia
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [26] The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B
    Dan Yang
    Hong Hu
    Rui Li
    Chun-Lin Tang
    Kuan-Sheng Ma
    De-Yu Guo
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 630 - 639
  • [27] The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B
    Yang, Dan
    Hu, Hong
    Li, Rui
    Tang, Chun-Lin
    Ma, Kuan-Sheng
    Guo, De-Yu
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (02) : 630 - 639
  • [28] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection
    Li, Lingling
    Zheng, Wei
    Wang, Jianwei
    Han, Jing
    Guo, Zhixing
    Hu, Yixin
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Zhou, Jianhua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (03) : 434 - 443
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group
    Andrej Lyshchik
    Yuko Kono
    Christoph F. Dietrich
    Hyun-Jung Jang
    Tae Kyoung Kim
    Fabio Piscaglia
    Alexander Vezeridis
    Juergen K. Willmann
    Stephanie R. Wilson
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 861 - 879
  • [30] Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS version 2017: application on 271 liver nodules in individuals with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
    Huang, Zhe
    Zhou, PingPing
    Li, ShanShan
    Li, Kaiyan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 7146 - 7154