Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study

被引:3
|
作者
Ruan, Si-Min [1 ]
Cheng, Mei-Qing [1 ]
Huang, Hui [1 ]
Hu, Hang-Tong [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [1 ]
Lu, Ming-De [1 ,2 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Man-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; treatment response; hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; DRUG-ELUTING BEADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.2147/JHC.S353914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2???6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (??, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quantification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vascular Dynamics With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for LI-RADS Implementation
    Krolak, Connor
    Dighe, Manjiri
    Clark, Alicia
    Shumaker, Marissa
    Yeung, Raymond
    Barr, Richard G.
    Kono, Yuko
    Averkiou, Michalakis
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2024, 59 (04) : 337 - 344
  • [12] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Helmberger, Thomas
    Ignee, Andre
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (05): : 499 - 506
  • [13] CT/MRI LI-RADS 2024 Update: Treatment Response Assessment
    Aslam, Anum
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Miller, Frank H.
    Bashir, Mustafa
    Do, Richard
    Sirlin, Claude
    Lewandowski, Robert J.
    Kim, Charles Y.
    Kielar, Ania Zofia
    Kambadakone, Avinash R.
    Yarmohammadi, Hooman
    Kim, Edward
    Owen, Dawn
    Charalel, Resmi A.
    Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha
    Burke, Lauren M.
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 313 (02)
  • [14] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to assess hepatocellular carcinoma response to Transarterial chemoembolization using LI-RADS criteria: A pilot study
    Thibodeau-Antonacci, Alana
    Petitclerc, Leonie
    Gilbert, Guillaume
    Bilodeau, Laurent
    Olivie, Damien
    Cerny, Milena
    Castel, Helene
    Turcotte, Simon
    Huet, Catherine
    Perreault, Pierre
    Soulez, Gilles
    Chagnon, Miguel
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Tang, An
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 62 : 78 - 86
  • [15] CT versus MRI in Treatment Response Assessment with LI-RADS: The Choice Is Unclear
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 346 - 348
  • [16] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 - a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Noh, Seung Yeon
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    Vezeridis, Alexander
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [17] Impact of Reference Standard on CT, MRI, and Contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Tang, An
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (03) : 544 - 545
  • [18] Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS® observations on multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with cirrhosis
    Takeshi Yokoo
    Amit G. Singal
    Alberto Diaz de Leon
    Lakshmi Ananthakrishnan
    David T. Fetzer
    Ivan Pedrosa
    Gaurav Khatri
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 177 - 187
  • [19] The comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI LI-RADS for nodules ≤2 cm in patients at high risk for HCC: a prospective study
    Qin, Zhengyi
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhang, Xiang
    Ding, Jianmin
    Zhou, Hongyu
    Wang, Yandong
    Zhao, Lin
    Chen, Chen
    Jing, Xiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [20] Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS® observations on multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with cirrhosis
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Singal, Amit G.
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi
    Fetzer, David T.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Khatri, Gaurav
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (01) : 177 - 187