Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study

被引:3
|
作者
Ruan, Si-Min [1 ]
Cheng, Mei-Qing [1 ]
Huang, Hui [1 ]
Hu, Hang-Tong [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [1 ]
Lu, Ming-De [1 ,2 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Man-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; treatment response; hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; DRUG-ELUTING BEADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.2147/JHC.S353914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2???6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (??, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Long, Lei
    Zhang, Xiang
    Chen, Chen
    Zhou, Hongyu
    Zhou, Yan
    Wang, Yandong
    Jing, Xiang
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Wang, Fengmei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 847 - 854
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Jianmin Ding
    Lei Long
    Xiang Zhang
    Chen Chen
    Hongyu Zhou
    Yan Zhou
    Yandong Wang
    Xiang Jing
    Zhaoxiang Ye
    Fengmei Wang
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 847 - 854
  • [3] LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Avinash R. Kambadakone
    Alice Fung
    Rajan T. Gupta
    Thomas A. Hope
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Andrej Lyshchik
    Karthik Ganesan
    Vahid Yaghmai
    Alexander R. Guimaraes
    Dushyant V. Sahani
    Frank H. Miller
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 56 - 74
  • [4] VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND LI-RADS 2017 IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A COMPARISON STUDY WITH CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Zhou, Yan
    Jing, Xiang
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 687A - 687A
  • [5] Modified Algorithm for Contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 310 (01)
  • [6] LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (vol 43, pg 56, 2017)
    Kambadakone, Avinash R.
    Fung, Alice
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Ganesan, Karthik
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Guimaraes, Alexander R.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    Miller, Frank H.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [7] LI-RADS® algorithm: CT and MRI
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Santillan, Cynthia S.
    Papadatos, Demetri
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 111 - 126
  • [8] LI-RADS® algorithm: CT and MRI
    Victoria Chernyak
    Cynthia S. Santillan
    Demetri Papadatos
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 111 - 126
  • [9] LI-RADS ancillary features on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Dong, Yi
    Kono, Yuko
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Tang, An
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2020, 39 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [10] State of the Art: LI-RADS for Contrast-enhanced US
    Quaia, Emilio
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (01) : 4 - 14