Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial

被引:39
|
作者
Nandi, Anupa [1 ]
Bhide, Priya [1 ]
Hooper, Richard [2 ]
Gudi, Anil [1 ]
Shah, Amit [1 ]
Khan, Khalid [2 ]
Homburg, Roy [1 ]
机构
[1] Homerton Univ Hosp, Fertil Unit, London E9 6SR, England
[2] Blizard Inst, Womens Hlth Res Unit, London, England
关键词
In vitro fertilization; intrauterine insemination; unexplained subfertility; unexplained infertility; OVARIAN STIMULATION; COUPLES; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; CYCLES; SINGLE; SEMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the best first line management option for the treatment of unexplained subfertility-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with gonadotropins and IUI or IVF. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Single center trial in a tertiary referral unit. Patient(s): Couples with unexplained subfertility. Intervention(s): Couples were randomized to receive either three cycles of IUI + COH or one cycle of IVF. Main Outcome Measure(s): Singleton pregnancy rate (PR) per couple. Result(s): A total of 207 couples were randomly assigned to three cycles of IUI + COH (n = 101) or one cycle of IVF (n = 106). There were 25 (24.7%) singleton live births for the IUI + COH group and 33 (31.1%) for the IVF group (relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 - 1.96) with an absolute risk difference of 6.4% (95% CI - 5.8% to 18.6%). The multiple pregnancies per live birth were 4 (13.8%) for the IUI + COH group and 3 (8.3%) for the IVF group (relative risk, 0.6; 95% CI 0.14- 2.4). There were no cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the IUI group and three cases of OHSS (3.7%) in the IVF group. There were 17 live births from spontaneous conception in between treatment cycles (8.2%). Conclusion(s): The singleton live birth rate with one cycle of IVF was not significantly different than three cycles of IUI + COH. (C)2017 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility
    Rashidi, Mandana
    Aaleyasin, Ashraf
    Aghahosseini, Marzieh
    Loloi, Shohre
    Kokab, Abas
    Najmi, Zahra
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 169 (02) : 244 - 247
  • [22] A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CLOMIPHENE CITRATE AND INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION IN COUPLES WITH UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY OR SURGICALLY CORRECTED ENDOMETRIOSIS
    DEATON, JL
    GIBSON, M
    BLACKMER, KM
    NAKAJIMA, ST
    BADGER, GJ
    BRUMSTED, JR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1990, 54 (06) : 1083 - 1088
  • [23] Variability in Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Men with Mild/Unexplained Subfertility in a Prospective Longitudinal Intrauterine Insemination Trial
    Punjabi, Usha
    Roelant, Ella
    Peeters, Kris
    Goovaerts, Ilse
    Van Mulders, Helga
    De Neubourg, Diane
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [24] Should couples with unexplained infertility have three to six cycles of intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation or in vitro fertilization as first-line treatment?
    Ombelet, Willem
    van Eekelen, Rik
    McNally, Aine
    Ledger, William
    Doody, Kevin
    Farquhar, Cynthia
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (06) : 1141 - 1148
  • [25] Re: What Should the First-Line Treatment for Couples with Unexplained Infertility Be: Intrauterine Insemination or In Vitro Fertilization?
    Niederberger, Craig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (03): : 755 - 755
  • [26] Ultrasound-guided intrauterine insemination versus blind intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial
    Polat, I.
    Ekiz, A.
    Yildirim, G.
    Sabin, O.
    Ulker, V.
    Alkis, I.
    Tekirdag, A. I.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 42 (05): : 657 - 662
  • [27] CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION WITH OR WITHOUT INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY
    GREGORIOU, O
    VITORATOS, N
    PAPADIAS, C
    KONIDARIS, S
    GARGAROPOULOS, A
    LOURIDAS, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1995, 48 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [28] INTRACERVICAL INSEMINATION AND INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION FOR DONOR SPERM TREATMENT IN THE NATURAL CYCLE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Kop, Petronella A. L.
    van Wely, M.
    Soufan, Alexandre
    de Melker, Annemieke Aagje
    Mol, Ben W.
    Bernardus, Rob
    De Brucker, Michael
    Janssens, Pim M. W.
    Nap, Annemiek
    Cohlen, Ben J.
    Pieters, Jacqueline J. P. M.
    Repping, Sjoerd
    van der Veen, F.
    Mochtar, Monique H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E101 - E102
  • [29] Randomized controlled trial of minimal stimulation versus conventional in vitro fertilization
    Gleicher, Norbert
    Kushnir, Vitaly A.
    Barad, David H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (03) : 412 - 413
  • [30] Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Goverde, AJ
    McDonnell, J
    Vermeiden, JPW
    Schats, R
    Rutten, FFH
    Schoemaker, J
    LANCET, 2000, 355 (9197): : 13 - 18