Ultrasound-guided intrauterine insemination versus blind intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Polat, I. [1 ]
Ekiz, A. [1 ]
Yildirim, G. [1 ]
Sabin, O. [1 ]
Ulker, V. [1 ]
Alkis, I. [1 ]
Tekirdag, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Educ & Res Hosp, Infertil Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
Intrauterine insemination; Ultrasound guidance; Pregnancy rate; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; PREGNANCY RATES; METAANALYSIS; TENACULUM; SUCCESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study was performed to determine the effects of ultrasound (US) guidance during intrauterine insemination (IUI) on pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods. This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial which was performed in Women's Health Research and Education Hospital, Infertility Unit. The study enrolled 130 couples who were scheduled to undergo IUI. The couples were randomized according to a computer-generated list into two groups; 1) the ultrasound-guided IUI group included 64 couples (n = 64) treated for 99 cycles 2) blind IUI group included 66 couples (n = 66) treated for 104 cycles. All women underwent controlled ovarian stimulation before IUI. The study's main measurements were pregnancy rate per cycle; pregnancy rate per woman. Results: The pregnancy rates were similar in both the ultrasound-guided (USG)(16.2%, 16/99) and non-ultrasound-guided (NUSG)(12.5%, 13/104) groups (p = 0.386). Conclusions: The present results suggest a routine ultrasound guidance during IUI is not essential as it does not increase pregnancy rates but it can be used in such cases to overwhelm some sort of difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound guidance versus the blind method for intrauterine catheter insemination: A randomized controlled trial
    Mubarak, Sarah
    Yusoff, Noor Haliza
    Adnan, Tassha Hilda
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERM, 2019, 46 (02): : 87 - 94
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided artificial insemination: a randomized controlled trial
    Ramon, Olga
    Matorras, Roberto
    Corcostegui, Beatriz
    Meabe, Arantza
    Burgos, Jorge
    Exposito, Antonia
    Crisol, Lorena
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (05) : 1080 - 1084
  • [3] Intracervical insemination versus intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a randomized controlled trial
    Kop, P. A. L.
    van Wely, M.
    Nap, A.
    Soufan, A. T.
    de Melker, A. A.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Bernardus, R. E.
    De Brucker, M.
    Janssens, P. M. W.
    Pieters, J. J. P. M.
    Repping, S.
    van der Veen, F.
    Mochtar, M. H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (06) : 1175 - 1182
  • [4] Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided intrauterine device insertion
    Li, L.
    Wright, T.
    Estes, S. J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (03) : S793 - S794
  • [5] Prospective randomized trial of utero-tubal insemination versus conventional intrauterine insemination
    Prietl, GP
    van der Ven, HH
    Haidl, G
    Köhler, M
    Krebs, D
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 53 - 54
  • [6] Fallopian sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial and metaanalysis of the literature
    Trout, SW
    Kemmann, E
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (05) : 881 - 885
  • [7] Single versus Double Intrauterine Insemination in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Cycles: A Randomized Trial
    Sorouri, Ziba Zahiri
    Shomali, Romina Rashid
    Pourmarzi, Davoud
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2016, 19 (07) : 465 - 469
  • [8] The heterogeneity of randomized, controlled trials of intrauterine insemination
    Osuna, C
    Matorras, R
    Pijoan, JI
    Rodríguez-Escudero, FJ
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (01) : 34 - 35
  • [9] Intrauterine insemination and transcervical intratubal insemination:: a prospective, randomized and controlled study
    Breitbach, EJ
    Klein, S
    Schüring, A
    Kauffels, W
    Schlösser, HW
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 : 38 - 39
  • [10] Ultrasound guidance versus the classical method for intrauterine insemination in oral medication-stimulated cycles: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial
    Thanaboonyawat, Isarin
    Charanwetprasert, Manita
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    Petyim, Somsin
    Laokirkkiat, Pitak
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 258 : 278 - 282