Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility

被引:15
|
作者
Rashidi, Mandana [1 ]
Aaleyasin, Ashraf [1 ]
Aghahosseini, Marzieh [1 ]
Loloi, Shohre [1 ]
Kokab, Abas [1 ]
Najmi, Zahra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Dept Infertil, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Intrauterine insemination; Human menopausal gonadotropin; Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone; Unexplained infertility; HIGHLY PURIFIED HMG; OUTCOME FOLLOWING STIMULATION; FSH; CYCLES; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare two different gonadotropin preparations, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH), combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) in women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). Study design: In this prospective clinical trial, couples prepared for IUI cycles were randomly allocated to two groups either to receive CC and hMG (group A, n = 127) or CC and rFSH (group B, n = 132) for ovarian stimulation. Outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, OHSS, multiple pregnancy, cancelation, and live birth were compared between groups. Results: Duration of gonadotropin therapy was significantly shorter in group B (5.1 +/- 0.84 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.8 days, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). The total dose of administered gonadotropin was also significantly lower in group B (386.9 +/- 68.2 vs. 348.2 +/- 56.3 IU, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). Dominant follicle number (>17 mm), mean follicular diameter, and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection were similar. Clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, abortion, live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and cancelation rates were not statistically different between the groups. Conclusion: IUI cycles in which rFSH had been administered may require shorter duration and a lower total gonadotropin dose. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 247
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advantages of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone over Human Menopausal Gonadotropin in Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome-Associated Infertility
    Rashidi, Mandana
    Najmi, Zahra
    Mobasseri, Alireza
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2016, 81 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [2] Comparison of controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone
    Filicori, M
    Cognigni, GE
    Pocognoli, P
    Tabarelli, C
    Ferlini, F
    Perri, T
    Parmegiani, L
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (02) : 390 - 397
  • [3] Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination
    Gregoriou, Odysseas
    Vlahos, Nikos F.
    Konidaris, Socrates
    Papadias, Konstantinos
    Botsis, Dimitrios
    Creatsas, George K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (03) : 678 - 683
  • [4] Human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles
    van Wely, M
    Westergaard, LG
    Bossuyt, PMM
    van der Veen, F
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (05) : 1121 - 1122
  • [5] Comparison of daily and alternate day recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination
    Kabli, Nadia
    Sylvestre, Camille
    Tulandi, Togas
    Buckett, William
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1141 - 1144
  • [6] Follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis
    Agrawal, R
    Holmes, J
    Jacobs, HS
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (02) : 338 - 343
  • [7] Randomised Controlled Trial of Intrauterine Insemination with Ovarian Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility
    Liu, E.
    Farquhar, C.
    Armstrong, S.
    Arroll, N.
    Lensen, S.
    Brown, J.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 : 11 - 11
  • [8] Ovulation induction in the new millennium: Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin
    Al-Inany, H
    Aboulghar, MA
    Mansour, RT
    Serour, GI
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 20 (03) : 161 - 169
  • [9] Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial
    Vuong, T. N. L.
    Phung, H. T.
    Ho, M. T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (05) : 1188 - 1195
  • [10] Recombinant vs. urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination -: A randomized study
    Isaza, V
    Requena, A
    García-Velasco, JA
    Remohí, J
    Pellicer, A
    Simón, C
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 48 (02) : 112 - 118