Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization

被引:115
|
作者
Chandra, A
Dong, L
Huang, E
Kuban, DA
O'Neill, L
Rosen, I
Pollack, A
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
prostate; localization; ultrasound; radiation; alignment;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04612-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The NOMOS (Sewickley, PA) B-mode Acquisition and Targeting System (BAT) ultrasound system provides a rapid means of correcting for interfraction prostate positional variation. In this investigation, we report our experience on the clinical issues relevant to the daily use of the BAT system and the analysis of combined setup error and organ motion for 3509 BAT alignment procedures in 147 consecutive patients treated with IMRT for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: After setup to external skin marks, therapists performed the BAT ultrasound alignment procedure before each IMRT treatment. In this study, a single physician (A.C.) reviewed all BAT images and classified image quality and accuracy of image alignment by the therapist. On a scale of 1-3, near-perfect image quality or alignment was given a 1, fair image quality or misalignment less than or equal to5 mm (likely within the PTV) was given a 2, and unacceptable image quality or misalignment >5 mm (potential to violate the PTV) was given a value of 3. The distribution of shifts made was analyzed in each dimension and for all patients. The time required to perform the BAT alignment was also assessed in 17 patients. Results: Among the 3509 attempted BAT procedures, the image quality was judged to be poor or unacceptable in 5.1% (181). Of the remaining 3328 BAT images, with quality scores of 1-2, alignments were unacceptable (>5 mm misalignment as judged by the reviewing physician) in 3% (100). The mean shift in each direction, averaged over all patients, was 0.5-0.7 mm. Interfraction standard deviation (1 SD) of prostate position based on combined setup error and internal organ motion is 4.9 mm, 4.4 mm, and 2.8 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and lateral (RL) dimensions, respectively. The distribution of the shifts was a near-random Gaussian-type in all three major axes, with greater variations in AP and SI directions. The percent of BAT procedures in which the shift was > 5 mm was 28.6% in AP, 23 % in SI, and 9% in RL directions. The average BAT procedure took extra 5 min out of a 20-min time slot in a typical eight-field IMRT treatment. Conclusion: The quality of the daily ultrasound images was deemed acceptable in 95%. Major alignment errors by therapists were only 3%. The BAT system is clinically effective and feasible in a matter of 5 min. Although the accuracy of the BAT was not addressed in this investigation, we found a significant percentage of large shifts being made from the initial alignment position. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 447
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer
    Lattanzi, J
    McNeeley, S
    Pinover, W
    Horwitz, E
    Das, I
    Schultheiss, TE
    Hanks, GE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (04): : 719 - 725
  • [2] Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound-based IGRT with the Clarity platform
    Fiandra, Christian
    Guarneri, Alessia
    Munoz, Fernando
    Moretto, Francesco
    Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
    Levis, Mario
    Ragona, Riccardo
    Ricardi, Umberto
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (04): : 168 - 173
  • [3] Daily ultrasound-based prostate localization: can we reduce the margins for prostate motion?
    Vandeputte, V
    Hermans, J
    Bussels, B
    Depuydt, T
    Oyen, R
    Suetens, P
    Haustermans, K
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S181 - S182
  • [4] Ultrasound-based localization
    Kuban, DA
    Dong, L
    Cheung, R
    Strom, E
    De Crevoisier, R
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) : 180 - 191
  • [5] Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Morr, J
    DiPetrillo, T
    Tsai, JS
    Engler, M
    Wazer, DE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1124 - 1129
  • [6] Intensity modulated radiation therapy with ultrasound-based daily target localization for clinically localized prostate cancer: institutional experience and acute toxicity outcomes
    Melcon, I. Rodriguez
    Martin, C.
    Soria, P.
    Marques, E.
    Oviedo, A.
    Martin, M.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 297 - 297
  • [7] Comparison between CT-based and ultrasound-based localization for prostate patients
    Paskalev, K.
    Feigenberg, S.
    McNeeley, S.
    Horwitz, E.
    Price, R.
    Wang, L.
    Konski, A.
    Ma, C.
    Pollack, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2028 - 2028
  • [8] Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy
    Langen, KM
    Pouliot, J
    Anezinos, C
    Aubin, M
    Gottschalk, AR
    Hsu, IC
    Lowther, D
    Liu, YM
    Shinohara, K
    Verhey, LJ
    Weinberg, V
    Roach, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03): : 635 - 644
  • [9] Improving ultrasound-based prostate volume estimation
    Saro Aprikian
    Murilo Luz
    Fadi Brimo
    Eleonora Scarlata
    Lucie Hamel
    Fabio L. Cury
    Simon Tanguay
    Armen G. Aprikian
    Wassim Kassouf
    Simone Chevalier
    BMC Urology, 19
  • [10] Improving ultrasound-based prostate volume estimation
    Aprikian, Saro
    Luz, Murilo
    Brimo, Fadi
    Scarlata, Eleonora
    Hamel, Lucie
    Cury, Fabio L.
    Tanguay, Simon
    Aprikian, Armen G.
    Kassouf, Wassim
    Chevalier, Simone
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1) : 68