Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound-based IGRT with the Clarity platform

被引:13
|
作者
Fiandra, Christian [1 ]
Guarneri, Alessia [2 ]
Munoz, Fernando [2 ]
Moretto, Francesco [1 ]
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo [1 ]
Levis, Mario [1 ]
Ragona, Riccardo [1 ]
Ricardi, Umberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Oncol, Radiat Oncol Unit, Turin, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Citta Salute & Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Turin, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
IGRT; ultrasound; Clarity; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; CT;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4795
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3-5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior-inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable (p = 0.956) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR (p = 0.105) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 173
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization
    Chandra, A
    Dong, L
    Huang, E
    Kuban, DA
    O'Neill, L
    Rosen, I
    Pollack, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02): : 436 - 447
  • [2] A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer
    Lattanzi, J
    McNeeley, S
    Pinover, W
    Horwitz, E
    Das, I
    Schultheiss, TE
    Hanks, GE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (04): : 719 - 725
  • [3] Daily ultrasound-based prostate localization: can we reduce the margins for prostate motion?
    Vandeputte, V
    Hermans, J
    Bussels, B
    Depuydt, T
    Oyen, R
    Suetens, P
    Haustermans, K
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S181 - S182
  • [4] Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Morr, J
    DiPetrillo, T
    Tsai, JS
    Engler, M
    Wazer, DE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1124 - 1129
  • [5] Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy
    Fargier-Voiron, M.
    Presles, B.
    Pommier, P.
    Rit, S.
    Munoz, A.
    Liebgott, H.
    Sarrut, D.
    Biston, M. C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S141 - S142
  • [6] Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy
    Fargier-Voiron, Marie
    Presles, Benoit
    Pommier, Pascal
    Rit, Simon
    Munoz, Alexandre
    Liebgott, Herve
    Sarrut, David
    Biston, Marie-Claude
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [7] IGRT for prostate cancer with ultrasound-based system and surface imaging system: role of the two methods
    Krengli, M.
    Beldi, D.
    Pagliuca, M. Di Genesio
    Apicella, G.
    Amisano, V.
    Pisani, C.
    Guffi, M.
    Mazzola, L.
    Loi, G.
    Brambilla, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S90 - S90
  • [8] Intensity modulated radiation therapy with ultrasound-based daily target localization for clinically localized prostate cancer: institutional experience and acute toxicity outcomes
    Melcon, I. Rodriguez
    Martin, C.
    Soria, P.
    Marques, E.
    Oviedo, A.
    Martin, M.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 297 - 297
  • [9] Comparison between CT-based and ultrasound-based localization for prostate patients
    Paskalev, K.
    Feigenberg, S.
    McNeeley, S.
    Horwitz, E.
    Price, R.
    Wang, L.
    Konski, A.
    Ma, C.
    Pollack, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2028 - 2028
  • [10] Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy
    Langen, KM
    Pouliot, J
    Anezinos, C
    Aubin, M
    Gottschalk, AR
    Hsu, IC
    Lowther, D
    Liu, YM
    Shinohara, K
    Verhey, LJ
    Weinberg, V
    Roach, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03): : 635 - 644