Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound-based IGRT with the Clarity platform

被引:13
|
作者
Fiandra, Christian [1 ]
Guarneri, Alessia [2 ]
Munoz, Fernando [2 ]
Moretto, Francesco [1 ]
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo [1 ]
Levis, Mario [1 ]
Ragona, Riccardo [1 ]
Ricardi, Umberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Oncol, Radiat Oncol Unit, Turin, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Citta Salute & Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Turin, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
IGRT; ultrasound; Clarity; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; CT;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4795
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3-5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior-inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable (p = 0.956) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR (p = 0.105) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 173
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Comparison between CT-based and ultrasound-based daily target localization for post-prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT
    Paskalev, K
    Feigenberg, S
    Jacob, R
    McNeeley, S
    Horwitz, E
    Ma, C
    Pollack, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1870 - 1870
  • [22] Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry
    Lee, Junghoon
    Mian, Omar Y.
    Le, Yi
    Bae, Hee Joon
    Burdette, E. Clif
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    Prince, Jerry L.
    Song, Daniel Y.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [23] Applicability and dosimetric impact of ultrasound-based preplanning in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer
    Aebersold, DM
    Isaak, B
    Thalmann, G
    Behrensmeier, F
    Kolotas, C
    Kranzbühler, H
    Mini, R
    Greiner, RH
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2004, 180 (06) : 351 - 357
  • [24] A Comparative Study for Daily Localization with 3D Ultrasound, Cone Beam CT, Implanted Prostate Fiducial Markers and Calypso 4D Localization System for Patients Undergoing IGRT for Prostate Cancer
    Neicu, T.
    Ren, L.
    Chetty, I.
    Pradhan, D.
    Stricker, H.
    Movsas, B.
    Elshaikh, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [25] Comparison of intra-modality and cross-modality ultrasound-based image-guided systems for prostate localization
    Cury, F
    Shenouda, G
    Duclos, M
    David, M
    Faria, S
    Souhami, L
    Corns, R
    Falco, T
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1872 - 1872
  • [26] Directional prevalence of isocenter adjustment and prostate motion from ultrasound-based localization during delivery of conformal radiation therapy
    Fung, AYC
    Enke, CA
    Ayyangar, KM
    Raman, NV
    Thompson, RB
    Zhen, W
    Li, S
    Nehru, RM
    Pillai, S
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1879 - 1879
  • [27] Comparison of BAT system and a new 3D trans-abdominal ultrasound-based image-guided system for prostate daily localization during external beam radiotherapy
    Cury, F
    Shenouda, G
    Souhami, L
    Duclos, M
    Faria, S
    David, M
    Corns, R
    Falco, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S329 - S329
  • [28] Dosimetric impact of inter-observer catheter reconstruction variability in ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Nicolae, Alexandru
    Murgic, Jure
    Kruljac, Ivan
    Dubnitzky, Lior
    D'Alimonte, Laura
    Lu, Lin
    Cumal, Aaron
    Law, Niki
    Morton, Gerard
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Chung, Hans T.
    Ravi, Ananth
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 17 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [29] Evaluation of the Clinical Impact of the Differences Between Planned and Delivered Doses in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Based On Daily IGRT and Patient-Reported Outcome Scores
    Mavroidis, P.
    Hammers, J.
    Narayanasamy, G.
    Sud, S.
    Lindsay, D.
    Tan, X.
    Dooley, J.
    Stathakis, S.
    Marks, L.
    Chen, R.
    Das, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E717 - E718
  • [30] Evaluation of the Clinical Impact of the Difference Between Planned and Delivered Dose in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Based On Daily IGRT and Patient-Reported Outcome Scores
    Hammers, J.
    Lindsay, D.
    Tan, X.
    Dooley, J.
    Stathakis, S.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Marks, L.
    Wang, A.
    Chen, R.
    Das, S.
    Mavroidis, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E586 - E586