Machine-learning methods for stream water temperature prediction

被引:66
|
作者
Feigl, Moritz [1 ]
Lebiedzinski, Katharina [1 ]
Herrnegger, Mathew [1 ]
Schulz, Karsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Hydrol & Water Management, Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; AIR-TEMPERATURE; RIVER TEMPERATURE; MODELS; PERFORMANCE; OXYGEN; BASIN;
D O I
10.5194/hess-25-2951-2021
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Water temperature in rivers is a crucial environmental factor with the ability to alter hydro-ecological as well as socio-economic conditions within a catchment. The development of modelling concepts for predicting river water temperature is and will be essential for effective integrated water management and the development of adaptation strategies to future global changes (e.g. climate change). This study tests the performance of six different machine-learning models: step-wise linear regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), feed-forward neural networks (FNNs), and two types of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). All models are applied using different data inputs for daily water temperature prediction in 10 Austrian catchments ranging from 200 to 96 000 km(2) and exhibiting a wide range of physiographic characteristics. The evaluated input data sets include combinations of daily means of air temperature, runoff, precipitation and global radiation. Bayesian optimization is applied to optimize the hyperparameters of all applied machine-learning models. To make the results comparable to previous studies, two widely used benchmark models are applied additionally: linear regression and air2stream. With a mean root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.55 degrees C, the tested models could significantly improve water temperature prediction compared to linear regression (1.55 degrees C) and air2stream (0.98 degrees C). In general, the results show a very similar performance of the tested machine-learning models, with a median RMSE difference of 0.08 degrees C between the models. From the six tested machine-learning models both FNNs and XGBoost performed best in 4 of the 10 catchments. RNNs are the best-performing models in the largest catchment, indicating that RNNs mainly perform well when processes with long-term dependencies are important. Furthermore, a wide range of performance was observed for different hyperparameter sets for the tested models, showing the importance of hyperparameter optimization. Especially the FNN model results showed an extremely large RMSE standard deviation of 1.60 degrees C due to the chosen hyperparameters. This study evaluates different sets of input variables, machine-learning models and training characteristics for daily stream water temperature prediction, acting as a basis for future development of regional multi-catchment water temperature prediction models. All preprocessing steps and models are implemented in the open-source R package wateRtemp to provide easy access to these modelling approaches and facilitate further research.
引用
收藏
页码:2951 / 2977
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine-Learning Based TCP Security Action Prediction
    Zhao, Quanling
    Sun, Jiawei
    Ren, Hongjia
    Sun, Guodong
    [J]. 2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL, CONTROL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ICMCCE 2020), 2020, : 1325 - 1329
  • [42] Machine-learning techniques for the prediction of protein–protein interactions
    Debasree Sarkar
    Sudipto Saha
    [J]. Journal of Biosciences, 2019, 44
  • [43] Machine-learning models for prediction of sepsis patients mortality
    Bao, C.
    Deng, F.
    Zhao, S.
    [J]. MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2023, 47 (06) : 315 - 325
  • [44] Performance Prediction of NUMA Placement: a Machine-Learning Approach
    Arapidis, Fanourios
    Karakostas, Vasileios
    Papadopoulou, Nikela
    Nikas, Konstantinos
    Goumas, Georgios
    Koziris, Nectarios
    [J]. 2018 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE (CLOUDCOM 2018), 2018, : 296 - 301
  • [45] Energy landscapes for a machine-learning prediction of patient discharge
    Das, Ritankar
    Wales, David J.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2016, 93 (06)
  • [46] Design of Machine-Learning Classifier for Stock Market Prediction
    Srivastava A.K.
    Srivastava A.
    Singh S.
    Sugandha S.
    Tripta
    Gupta S.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2022, 3 (1)
  • [47] Representation of compounds for machine-learning prediction of physical properties
    Seko, Atsuto
    Hayashi, Hiroyuki
    Nakayama, Keita
    Takahashi, Akira
    Tanaka, Isao
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2017, 95 (14)
  • [48] Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Using Machine-learning Methods in the Middle-aged Korean Population
    Kim, Hyeon Chang
    Jo, In-Jeong
    Sung, Ji Min
    Chang, Hyuk-Jae
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 135
  • [49] Probabilistic Machine-Learning Methods for Performance Prediction of Structure and Infrastructures through Natural Gradient Boosting
    Chen, Shi-Zhi
    Feng, De-Cheng
    Wang, Wen-Jie
    Taciroglu, Ertugrul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (08)
  • [50] Prediction of the traffic incident duration using statistical and machine-learning methods: A systematic literature review
    Korkmaz, Huseyin
    Erturk, Mehmet Ali
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 207