Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

被引:153
|
作者
Alfonso, Jose F.
Fernandez-Vega, Luis
Baamonde, M. Begona
Mont-Mico, Robert
机构
[1] Inst Oftalmol Fernandez Vega, Oviedo 33012, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt, Fac Phys, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004 (SD) and 0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR and 0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P <.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P >.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: Optical and visual evaluation
    Zelichowska, Beata
    Rekas, Marek
    Stankiewicz, Andrzej
    Cervino, Alejandro
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (12): : 2036 - 2042
  • [2] Energy balance in apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses
    Alba-Bueno, Francisco
    Vega, Fidel
    Millan, Maria S.
    22ND CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR OPTICS: LIGHT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD, 2011, 8011
  • [3] Prospective analysis of visual outcomes using apodized, diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses following phacoemulsification for cataract or clear lens extraction
    Altaie, Rasha
    Ring, C. Peter
    Morarji, Jasha
    Patel, Dipika V.
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (02): : 148 - 154
  • [4] Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Rick
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 805 - 811
  • [5] Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth
    Labuz, Grzegorz
    van der Meulen, Ivanka J.
    van der Linden, Jan Willem
    Mourits, M. P.
    van den Berg, Tom J.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 31 (11) : 746 - 751
  • [6] In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Madrid-Costa, David
    Ruiz-Alcocer, Javier
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Pons, Alvaro M.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (06): : 928 - 936
  • [7] Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a+3.0 D addition
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Nuijts, Rudy
    Levy, Pierre
    Haefliger, Eduard
    Alfonso, Jose F.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (12): : 2062 - 2069
  • [8] Visual outcomes after progressive apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation
    Garcia-Bella, Javier
    Ventura-Abreu, Nestor
    Morales-Fernandez, Laura
    Talavero-Gonzalez, Paula
    Carballo-Alvarez, Jesus
    Carlos Sanz-Fernandez, Juan
    Vazquez-Molini, Jose M.
    Martinez-de-la-Case, Jose M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 282 - 286
  • [9] Energy Distribution between Distance and Near Images in Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Vega, Fidel
    Alba-Bueno, Francisco
    Millan, Maria S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (08) : 5695 - 5701
  • [10] Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses
    Vingolo, Enzo Maria
    Grenga, PierLuigi
    Iacobelli, Luca
    Grenga, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (07): : 1244 - 1247